Re: on why are you a bunch of racist pricks?

At Thu, 20 Aug 2026 16:59:57 -0700, dart200 <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 8/20/26 12:49 PM, Wilson wrote:
> > On 8/20/2026 1:02 PM, dart200 wrote:
> >> On 8/20/26 6:01 AM, Wilson wrote:
> >>> On 8/19/2026 5:26 PM, dart200 wrote:
> >>>> On 8/19/26 2:03 PM, Wilson wrote:
> >>>>> On 8/19/2026 4:03 PM, dart200 wrote:
> >>>>>> On 8/19/26 11:34 AM, Wilson wrote:
> >>>>>>> On 8/18/2026 8:54 PM, Creon wrote:
> >>>>>>>> At Mon, 17 Aug 2026 21:44:50 -0400, Noah Sombrero 
> >>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2026 17:00:30 -0400, Wilson 
> >>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> On 8/17/2026 3:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> On 8/17/26 8:18 AM, Wilson wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> A nation is more than the dirt. It's mostly the people who 
> >>>>>>>>>>>> live there.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> If you allow unlimited migration against the will of the 
> >>>>>>>>>>>> people who
> >>>>>>>>>>>> are currently living in a place, that's an infringement on 
> >>>>>>>>>>>> their
> >>>>>>>>>>>> person, their humanity. Vast numbers of new people who don't 
> >>>>>>>>>>>> fit in
> >>>>>>>>>>>> with the
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> uhhh ... these aren't extraterrestrial aliens were talking 
> >>>>>>>>>>> about, they
> >>>>>>>>>>> are also humans. i think ur the one who's lost their humanity 
> >>>>>>>>>>> u fucking
> >>>>>>>>>>> racist tard
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> lives and ways of the current resident could (and likely would)
> >>>>>>>>>>>> destroy their nation.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> the sf bay area where i'm from is 35% white, 30% asian, 25% 
> >>>>>>>>>>> latino, 5%
> >>>>>>>>>>> black, and 5% other. i can assure you that we haven't "lost" our
> >>>>>>>>>>> humanity u racist tard. in fact one of these reasons i don't 
> >>>>>>>>>>> want to
> >>>>>>>>>>> move away from the bay is the multicultural aspect and the 
> >>>>>>>>>>> fact people
> >>>>>>>>>>> here aren't generally racist pricks like urself...
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> But collectivist ideology places the immigrant above the 
> >>>>>>>>>>>> residents who
> >>>>>>>>>>>> are already there, because "muh feeeelz!".
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> violating basic freedom of movement by chaining 7/8ths people 
> >>>>>>>>>>> on this
> >>>>>>>>>>> planet to their nation states is not just a matter of "muh 
> >>>>>>>>>>> feeeelz" you
> >>>>>>>>>>> inhumane prick
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> They just don't care about the people and the lives and that 
> >>>>>>>>>>>> would be
> >>>>>>>>>>>> destroyed.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> lol, u really don't think capitalism is that powerful of 
> >>>>>>>>>>> economic
> >>>>>>>>>>> system, eh? ur whole narrative of "general progress" is that 
> >>>>>>>>>>> much of a
> >>>>>>>>>>> fragile pile of godshit eh?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> It's not racist to want to preserve your heritage and the same 
> >>>>>>>>>> would
> >>>>>>>>>> apply if all of the people were white or any other race.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> What do you think would happen if several million Russians 
> >>>>>>>>>> fleeing Putin
> >>>>>>>>>> wanted to move to one of the smaller islands in the Philippines?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Fallacy alert:  ad absurdum.  You really gotta cut that out, 
> >>>>>>>>> wilson.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Um, don't look now -- but logical arguments aren't fallacies simply
> >>>>>>>> because there are colloquial Latin names for them.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> An "ad absurdum" argument is perfectly valid.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I think I should have used the Chinese as an example instead of 
> >>>>>>> Russians as that would be more likely in the Philippines. That 
> >>>>>>> potential is a solid one and not absurd at all.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/philippines-orders- 
> >>>>>>> foreign- workers-offshore-gaming-hubs-leave-2-months-2024-07-24/
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> "Philippine immigration chief Norman Tansingco said in a 
> >>>>>>> statement foreign workers had 59 days to leave the country. 
> >>>>>>> Around 20,000 people are expected to be affected by the order, 
> >>>>>>> most of them Chinese citizens.
> >>>>>>> Workers who stay in the country beyond the two-month period will 
> >>>>>>> be deported, he added."
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3364178/ 
> >>>>>>> beijing- and- manila-clash-over-arrests-illegal-workers-tensions- 
> >>>>>>> worsen
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> "In May, Teodoro directed armed forces to detain 70 allegedly 
> >>>>>>> undocumented Chinese nationals at the Sanjia Steel Corporation 
> >>>>>>> plant, prompting formal protests from Beijing and consular visits."
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> It looks like the Philippine government has a strict policy 
> >>>>>>> around immigration and has no problem deporting people who don't 
> >>>>>>> follow their rules.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> err some filipino official saying something and it actually 
> >>>>>> happening are too very different things wilson. heck prolly did 
> >>>>>> actually deport some, but to the extent that this actually stopped 
> >>>>>> anything is a totally different matter
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> u have to understand the philippines is a archipelago not the far 
> >>>>>> from other mainlands, and they don't have that much of a navy to 
> >>>>>> speak of. they just don't have the resources to meaningfully 
> >>>>>> protect their borders all that well.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> nvm that much of the commercial oligarchy is already dominated by 
> >>>>>> filipino-chinese (chinoy) families, which ofc u'll never find 
> >>>>>> really detailed in the news cause journos are basically all brain 
> >>>>>> dead everywhere.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> they couldn't get rid of serious chinese influence even if they 
> >>>>>> wanted to, dicking about poor people with coercive measures is 
> >>>>>> just propaganda for sub-critical sheeple like you
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You aren't even addressing the thing: small countries want to 
> >>>>> protect their people from being overwhelmed.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> and you aren't even addressing the bigger thing:
> >>>>
> >>>> you don't believe market economics is fair, apparently
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> What do you mean by "fair".
> >>>
> >>
> >> you tell me bro... ur the one that supports coercively chaining 7/8ths 
> >> of the planet to their respective nation states, because opening it up 
> >> and allowing the market to work freely across borders is "unfair" to you
> > 
> > Apparently you're not smart enough to understand, as I keep telling you 
> > what I think and you keep repeating your tired talking points.
> > 
> 
> and i'm going to keep repeating it cause i'm tired of u not actually 
> accepting in the fairness of open free markets

"open free markets" are not "fair".

A "fair" market has referees.

-- 
-c System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 Mem: 258G
   OS: Linux 7.2.0 D: Mint 22.3 DE: Xfce 4.18 (X11)
   NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090Ti (24G) (610.57.04)
   "No, I'm from Iowa. I only work in Outer Space."