Re: on why are you a bunch of racist pricks?

On Fri, 21 Aug 2026 10:14:08 +0000, Creon <[email protected]> wrote:

>At Wed, 19 Aug 2026 00:26:30 -0400, Noah Sombrero <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 18 Aug 2026 20:52:20 -0700, dart200
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> >On 8/18/26 8:50 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 18 Aug 2026 20:28:33 -0700, dart200
>> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> 
>> >>> On 8/18/26 5:54 PM, Creon wrote:
>> >>>> At Mon, 17 Aug 2026 21:44:50 -0400, Noah Sombrero <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2026 17:00:30 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
>> >>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> On 8/17/2026 3:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
>> >>>>>>> On 8/17/26 8:18 AM, Wilson wrote:
>> >>>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 10:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>> On 8/16/26 7:24 PM, Dude wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 4:40 PM, dart200 wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> something both liberals and libertarians shit all over everyone's
>> >>>>>>>>>>> basic freedom of movement just to keep their damned ungodly
>> >>>>>>>>>>> narratives from croaking out completely
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> 7/8 people on this planet are enslaved to their nation state and
>> >>>>>>>>>>> capitalism will have nothing to do with solving the lack of basic
>> >>>>>>>>>>> freedom on this planet
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> You can't have open borders in a welfare state.
>> >>>>>>>>> i'm sorry... why can't you have a global welfare state?
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> rhetorical question dud: it's because capitalism hasn't been
>> >>>>>>>>> prosperous enough
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> basically we have closed borders and shit on the basic freedom of 7/8
>> >>>>>>>>> of the total global population because capitalism needs to maintain
>> >>>>>>>>> it's ungodly stupid narrative of "general prosperity"
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>     > you people are fucking psychos tbh
>> >>>>>>>>>     >
>> >>>>>>>>>     > #god
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> A nation is more than the dirt. It's mostly the people who live there.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> If you allow unlimited migration against the will of the people who
>> >>>>>>>> are currently living in a place, that's an infringement on their
>> >>>>>>>> person, their humanity. Vast numbers of new people who don't fit in
>> >>>>>>>> with the
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> uhhh ... these aren't extraterrestrial aliens were talking about, they
>> >>>>>>> are also humans. i think ur the one who's lost their humanity u fucking
>> >>>>>>> racist tard
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> lives and ways of the current resident could (and likely would)
>> >>>>>>>> destroy their nation.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> the sf bay area where i'm from is 35% white, 30% asian, 25% latino, 5%
>> >>>>>>> black, and 5% other. i can assure you that we haven't "lost" our
>> >>>>>>> humanity u racist tard. in fact one of these reasons i don't want to
>> >>>>>>> move away from the bay is the multicultural aspect and the fact people
>> >>>>>>> here aren't generally racist pricks like urself...
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> But collectivist ideology places the immigrant above the residents who
>> >>>>>>>> are already there, because "muh feeeelz!".
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> violating basic freedom of movement by chaining 7/8ths people on this
>> >>>>>>> planet to their nation states is not just a matter of "muh feeeelz" you
>> >>>>>>> inhumane prick
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> They just don't care about the people and the lives and that would be
>> >>>>>>>> destroyed.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> lol, u really don't think capitalism is that powerful of economic
>> >>>>>>> system, eh? ur whole narrative of "general progress" is that much of a
>> >>>>>>> fragile pile of godshit eh?
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> It's not racist to want to preserve your heritage and the same would
>> >>>>>> apply if all of the people were white or any other race.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> What do you think would happen if several million Russians fleeing Putin
>> >>>>>> wanted to move to one of the smaller islands in the Philippines?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Fallacy alert:  ad absurdum.  You really gotta cut that out, wilson.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Um, don't look now -- but logical arguments aren't fallacies simply
>> >>>> because there are colloquial Latin names for them.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> An "ad absurdum" argument is perfectly valid.
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> creon is correct about that ad absurdum is a valid argument style, the
>> >>> term noah was looking for is slippery slope fallacy
>> >> 
>> >> Not so.
>> >
>> >???
>> 
>> Wiki calls it Reduction ad absurd um
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_absurdum
>
>Now if you would only read the entry...
See my previous post in this thread.
-- 
Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain
Don't get political with me young man
or I'll tie you to a railroad track and
<<<talk>>> to <<<YOOooooo>>>
Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?
dares: Ned
does not dare: Julian  shrinks in horror and warns others away