Re: on why are you a bunch of racist pricks?
Wilson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.buddha.short.fat.guy,alt.messianic |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/23/2026 12:37 PM, dart200 wrote: > On 8/23/26 7:54 AM, Wilson wrote: >> On 8/22/2026 3:28 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote: >>> On Sat, 22 Aug 2026 15:01:58 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> On 8/22/2026 2:39 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 22 Aug 2026 13:34:33 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> On 8/21/2026 4:48 PM, dart200 wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> you're not even well meaning you greedy narcissistic fuck. you don't >>>>>>> give one single actual fuck about the filipino people or their >>>>>>> predicament. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> you don't acknowledge the fact we're _all_ god's children, and _all_ >>>>>>> deserving of fair access to this planet, nvm it's the resources >>>>>>> contained within it it... >>>>>> >>>>>> Ownership of property is a right that needs to be protected, you >>>>>> commie >>>>>> idiot. >>>>> >>>>> If you are a violent sort of person. >>>> >>>> Violence against property owners is widely condemned. >>> >>> But not more than for any other kind. >>> >>>> And if a >>>> government is worth the space it takes up, it protects the people's >>>> rights. >>> >>> "protects the people's rights." >>> >>> How did this discussion become about all rights, rather then whether >>> exclusive ownership of land is or ought to be a right? >> >> Of course far-left whackadoodles like you and Nick wish it weren't, it >> not only ought to be, it is. >> > > lol, the only right you care about is property rights wilson. and that's > not even much of a right cause most people don't have any property 🤣 > Spoken like a true redistributionist petite-tyrant.