Re: on why are you a bunch of racist pricks?

On 23/08/2026 18:14, Wilson wrote:
> On 8/23/2026 12:37 PM, dart200 wrote:
>> On 8/23/26 7:54 AM, Wilson wrote:
>>> On 8/22/2026 3:28 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 22 Aug 2026 15:01:58 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On 8/22/2026 2:39 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Aug 2026 13:34:33 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 8/21/2026 4:48 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> you're not even well meaning you greedy narcissistic fuck. you 
>>>>>>>> don't
>>>>>>>> give one single actual fuck about the filipino people or their 
>>>>>>>> predicament.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> you don't acknowledge the fact we're _all_ god's children, and 
>>>>>>>> _all_
>>>>>>>> deserving of fair access to this planet, nvm it's the resources
>>>>>>>> contained within it it...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ownership of property is a right that needs to be protected, you 
>>>>>>> commie
>>>>>>> idiot.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you are a violent sort of person.
>>>>>
>>>>> Violence against property owners is widely condemned.
>>>>
>>>> But not more than for any other kind.
>>>>
>>>>> And if a
>>>>> government is worth the space it takes up, it protects the people's 
>>>>> rights.
>>>>
>>>> "protects the people's rights."
>>>>
>>>> How did this discussion become about all rights, rather then whether
>>>> exclusive ownership of land is or ought to be a right?
>>>
>>> Of course far-left whackadoodles like you and Nick wish it weren't, 
>>> it not only ought to be, it is.
>>>
>>
>> lol, the only right you care about is property rights wilson. and 
>> that's not even much of a right cause most people don't have any 
>> property 🤣
>>
> 
> Spoken like a true redistributionist petite-tyrant.

Most people without property live in countries with regimes
that care little for property rights.