Re: Global Warming Alert

At Mon, 24 Aug 2026 23:10:42 -0000 (UTC), Tara <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Aug 24, 2026 at 6:47:09 PM EDT, "Tara" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Aug 24, 2026 at 6:33:41 PM EDT, "Noah Sombrero" <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 24 Aug 2026 18:27:20 -0000 (UTC), Tara <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Noah Sombrero <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>> On Mon, 24 Aug 2026 16:54:59 -0000 (UTC), Tara <[email protected]>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Aug 24, 2026 at 5:04:27?AM EDT, "dart200"
> >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On 8/23/26 7:31 PM, Creon wrote:
> >>>>>>> At Fri, 21 Aug 2026 13:49:55 -0700, dart200
> >>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 8/21/26 11:50 AM, Dude wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On 8/18/2026 2:06 PM, dart200 wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> On 8/18/26 2:01 PM, Dude wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> On 8/18/2026 1:13 PM, dart200 wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/18/26 9:26 AM, Wilson wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/17/2026 11:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/17/26 5:25 PM, Doc Hammerslack wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> At Mon, 17 Aug 2026 16:32:05 -0700, Dude
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/17/2026 12:39 PM, dart200 wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/17/26 10:08 AM, Dude wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 7:41 PM, dart200 wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/16/26 7:13 PM, Dude wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 4:30 PM, Wilson wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 5:12 PM, Creon wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> At Sun, 16 Aug 2026 15:27:48 -0400, Wilson
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/16/2026 2:29 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 16 Aug 2026 14:06:50 -0400, Wilson
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/15/2026 6:24 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 15 Aug 2026 14:46:19 -0400, Wilson
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You don't ever acknowledge your beliefs
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as being ideological. You think you're
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dealing in the realm of truthiness while
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm just repeating propaganda. And tbh, a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lot of times I think you're just
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repeating what your media told you,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things that tickle your preset biases.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So it goes.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What it comes down to is that I say, when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you refusal to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Know that the 2020 election was not stolen
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from himbo, and the attack on the attempt
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to count electoral ballots was in fact an
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attack and not something else, and that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> election fraud might happen once in a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> while but it is not a problem in the us.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is a sample.	The list is long,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including attempts to prosecute himbo's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> critics and pardon criminals who do not
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> criticize him.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I say that refusal to know is self evident
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bull shit. That does not put me on throne
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of belief.  But it sure does sink you into
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the depths of delusion.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're so high on your own beliefs you
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can't even see that's what you're standing
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And you have nothing to say about my list
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> above.  Of course you don't we have been
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> over this stuff so many times.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes indeed, why bother. You're not an honest
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> debater and you see me the same way.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm still wondering if you trust the news
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> source from which you "learned" that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> California didn't allow controlled burns.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In context some areas do restrict controlled
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> burns. I don't remember where I saw it and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> maybe I was the one who conflated that policy
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with the whole state.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's just one item that you were corrected
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on.  I wonder how many other "facts" of that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> provenence you hold in your memory banks.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> At least I admit it when I'm proven wrong.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let's not forget we're dialoging with a guy who
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> believes the Jews attacked the WTC on 9/11 and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> brought down the WTC-7 with explosives planted
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on the inside.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> let's not forget 7/8ths of the planet is chained
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to their nation states because psychos like you
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want to live in an fake illusion of general
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prosperity
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let's not forget that 99.9% of all people on earth
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> live in nation states. Only a very tiny minority
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are stateless.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is this supposed to justify violating basic freedom
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of movement for 7/8ths people on the planet???
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can't have open borders in a welfare state.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What weenerbrane is describing would be some kind of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "even newer world order".
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Name one country that doesn't check your passport
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when you cross a border.  (They might allow that in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the EU, but not even sure about that.)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> yes were so normalized to shitting all over basic
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> freedom of movement, to point where 7/8 people on this
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> planet are chained to their nation state without any
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> choice in the matter, we should just keep doing it...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> just like we should have just kept around slavery,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> eh???
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's funny u think this shitshow of a subethical
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> species even deserves sustainability. but the jokes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> truly on me cause most of u chucklefucks have ur head
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> shoved so far up ur asshole u can't even admit there's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a problem
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cause it would completely break the fragile ideology
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> u preach
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #god
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> cons and not wanting to study things cause they can't
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> handle the truth: name a more iconic duo
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Why do you want to destroy the country you're living in?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> this nation is literally just a bunch of fucking
> >>>>>>>>>>>> immigrants u racist tard. it doesn't even function like
> >>>>>>>>>>>> a single coherent nation, it functions more like 12
> >>>>>>>>>>>> separate identities
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> We look forward to your questions concerning Albert
> >>>>>>>>>>> Einstein's theory of mass and the paradox of time
> >>>>>>>>>>> warping. Go!
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> again, dud you keep bleating on about enlightenment, but u
> >>>>>>>>>> display nothing of the sort in the slightest
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> You came here. For what? To bleat about enlightenment?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> YES WHERE IS THAT ENLIGHTENMENT YOU TARD???
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Creon tells how it is:
> >>>>>>> If you sit, after a while, your practice will deepen.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Once you've experienced kensho, your perspective will
> >>>>>>> realign itself.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So, Creon, whose perspective...yours? Or maybe something you've
> >>>>> been told it (kensho) should look like. . And you bought it. ;)
> >>>>> - Cali flake
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> nignog there ain't a whole lot of fucking "hUmIlItY" actually
> >>>>>> present in ye old group of senile cons,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'f you're looking for humility Nick, this is not the place to
> >>>>> find it. They don't believe in it.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> and this is entirely independent on the amount of
> >>>>>> enlightenment present,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> which is exactly and precisely none thus far
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Does anyone really know what so called 'enlightenment' is. From
> >>>>> what I can ken, it's something about a certain reality that you
> >>>>> 'realize'. Something specific that you've been told that you
> >>>>> should realize (when you 'become' enlightened, that is). And,
> >>>>> of course, happiness and fullfillment is now yours. And you get
> >>>>> to tell other people what to do.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Why is it that you can get 'enlightened' if you're a Christian,
> >>>>> (St Paul etc), a Buddhist, or in any other belief system. The
> >>>>> problem is that what you 'realize' as a so called, enlightened
> >>>>> being is different from what someone else has been told they
> >>>>> should realize according to the doctrine they've bought in to
> >>>>> and embraced.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> That's ok, you know..different strokes, eh.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> But, I'm not now or ever will be enlightened, and blasphemer
> >>>>> that I am, I really think the whole enlightenment thing is a
> >>>>> made up crock.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> However, on second thought, who are they to say that I'm not
> >>>>> enlightened. Or that I am. How would they know one way or the
> >>>>> other. Oh yeah, I forgot, if I believe what they do, right?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I am enlightened and so are you. But not in accord with the
> >>>>> Buddhist idea of what it is - and not conditional or in accord
> >>>>> with any other belief system.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I won't be replying if you (Nick) or anyone else decides to
> >>>>> answer this post. Be/Stay well.
> >>>>
> >>>> In common parlance, enlightened generally means, having abandoned
> >>>> foolish behaviors and become wiser than most.
> >>>
> >>> In common parlance maybe but not what I’ve read about Buddhist
> >>> Enlightenment. I was, as you know, or should know, referring to a
> >>> state where you realize the nature of reality ( according to the
> >>> Buddhist idea of what that is).
> >>
> >> Most of us are not qualified to talk about that.  Certainly  not
> >> to disparage one another for lack thereof.  Or even to know what a
> >> lack or presence would look like.
> >>
> >
> > Well, someone has been leaking some hints, otherwise I wouldn't
> > know the bit I do.
> >
> > I think that it's real and someone was truely enlightened,
>
> Sorry, the above post was sent by mistake.
>
> This is what I wrote:
>
> Noah said:
> "Most of us are not qualified to talk about that.  Certainly  not to
> disparage one another for lack thereof.  Or even to know what a lack
> or presence would look like."
>
> Me: 'Most"of us are not qualified to talk about it" you say.. Well,
> Someone has been putting out hints or I wouldn't know the bit about
> it that I do. I think however, that if someone is enlightened
> (assuming that enlightenment is real), they wouldn't be saying that
> they are or be putting out details about it's nature.

If not them, then who?

>
> There were some on apz who declared enlightenment. Or at least hinted
> that they were.

The ineffiable/mystical experience may be esoteric because its not
well understood.

See: holy rollers and snake handlers.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/1883536065/

>
> >
> >
> >>>
> >>> I know, I did what I said I wasn’t going to do (reply). Perfect
> >>> takes work.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Which is not a bit
> >>>> easier to attain or more commonly found	than any ancient
> >>>> concept of enlightenment you might hear of.
> >>>>
> >>>> In fact the opposite is so common that an enlightened person
> >>>> most likely will not get a hearing.  Most people not being wise
> >>>> enough to know it when they hear it.
> >>>>
> >>>> But it can be great fun to abuse each other for our lack of
> >>>> enlightenment, which of course implies that the abuser is
> >>>> possessed of such enlightenment.  In a world where we have no
> >>>> other way to recognize or claim it.
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> #god
> >>>>> Yeah!
> >>>
> >>>

-- 
-c System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 Mem: 258G
   OS: Linux 7.2.0 D: Mint 22.3 DE: Xfce 4.18 (X11)
   NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090Ti (24G) (610.57.04)
   "I'm an incorrigible punster, so don't corrige me!"