Re: on why are you a bunch of racist pricks?

On Mon, 24 Aug 2026 16:05:10 -0700, Dude <[email protected]> wrote:

>On 8/23/2026 7:09 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>> On Sun, 23 Aug 2026 16:54:16 -0700, Dude <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 8/23/2026 7:58 AM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 23 Aug 2026 10:54:14 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 8/22/2026 3:28 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Aug 2026 15:01:58 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 8/22/2026 2:39 PM, Noah Sombrero wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Aug 2026 13:34:33 -0400, Wilson <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 8/21/2026 4:48 PM, dart200 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> you're not even well meaning you greedy narcissistic fuck. you don't
>>>>>>>>>> give one single actual fuck about the filipino people or their predicament.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> you don't acknowledge the fact we're _all_ god's children, and _all_
>>>>>>>>>> deserving of fair access to this planet, nvm it's the resources
>>>>>>>>>> contained within it it...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ownership of property is a right that needs to be protected, you commie
>>>>>>>>> idiot.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you are a violent sort of person.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Violence against property owners is widely condemned.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But not more than for any other kind.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And if a
>>>>>>> government is worth the space it takes up, it protects the people's rights.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "protects the people's rights."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How did this discussion become about all rights, rather then whether
>>>>>> exclusive ownership of land is or ought to be a right?
>>>>>
>>>>> Of course far-left whackadoodles like you and Nick wish it weren't, it
>>>>> not only ought to be, it is.
>>>>
>>>> So lets get back to discussing what ought to be, and quit with the
>>>> blanket statements.  Dart and I agree on about as much as you and I
>>>> do.  It is emblematic of your thinking that you fail to notice that.
>>>>
>>> It looks like you did some snipping.
>>>
>>> Probably because of all the snipping and altering of the text, lying,
>>> cheating and being personal posting porn emojis.
>>>
>>> And, altering the Subject to who is the biggest racist prick; then
>>> changing the topic;  and cross posting to a Messiah cult.
>>>
>>> The question remains, so I repeat:
>>>
>> gone.
> >
>It looks like you did some snipping.
>
>The question remains, so I repeat:

Still gone.
-- 
Noah Sombrero mustachioed villain
Don't get political with me young man
or I'll tie you to a railroad track and
<<<talk>>> to <<<YOOooooo>>>
Who dares to talk to El Sombrero?
dares: Ned
does not dare: Julian  shrinks in horror and warns others away