Re: Protect Hunter! stablishment Media Ignore Alleged Payouts to Biden Family, Detailed in Hunter's Texts

On 2022-04-04 1:08 p.m., trump wrote:
> On 04 Apr 2022, % <[email protected]> posted some
> news:[email protected]:
> 
>> On 2022-04-04 12:41 p.m., L,H wrote:
>>> "stablishment Media Ignore Alleged Payouts to Biden Family, Detailed
>>> in Hunter’s Texts"
>>>
>>> <https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/04/04/establishment-media-
>>> ignore-biden-familys-alleged-payment-mechanism/>
>>>
>>> "The establishment media has reported on Hunter Biden’s $4.8
>>> million received in payments from a Chinese energy company, but not
>>> the alleged payout mechanism by which the Biden family likely
>>> profited from peddling influence.
>>>
>>> “I hope you all can do what I did and pay for everything for this
>>> entire family for 30 years,” Hunter texted his daughter, Naomi, in
>>> 2019, the New York Post reported in 2021.
>>>
>>> “It’s really hard. But don’t worry, unlike Pop [Joe], I won’t
>>> make you give me half your salary,” the text string continued as
>>> reported.
>>>
>>>
>>> Hunter’s reported texts indicate Joe Biden received 50 percent of
>>> his relative’s “salary” for a 30-year period. The reported
>>> texts do not reveal when the 30 years began or ended and whether Joe
>>> Biden is still a part of the payment scheme as president.
>>>
>>> The establishment media has ignored the reported string of Hunter’s
>>> text messages. Nowhere in the New York Times’s report in March
>>> about its authentication of Hunter’s laptop were the text messages
>>> mentioned.
>>>
>>> Alternatively, the Times story focused on a grand jury’s probe into
>>> Hunter’s “tax affairs” and corruption while his father was at
>>> the top levels of government:
>>>
>>> People familiar with the investigation said prosecutors had examined
>>> emails between Mr. Biden, Mr. Archer and others about Burisma and
>>> other foreign business activity. Those emails were obtained by The
>>> New York Times from a cache of files that appears to have come from a
>>> laptop abandoned by Mr. Biden in a Delaware repair shop. The email
>>> and others in the cache were authenticated by people familiar with
>>> them and with the investigation.
>>>
>>> The Washington Post, which also authenticated the laptop in March and
>>> acknowledged Hunter profited $4.8 million in retainer and consulting
>>> fees from a Chinese energy company throughout 2017 and 2018, likewise
>>> did not mention the string of text messages.
>>>
>>> Instead, the Post seemed to clear the president of any wrongdoing by
>>> suggesting its authentication of Hunter’s laptop showed no evidence
>>> that Biden benefited from the payment scheme as Hunter’s texts
>>> allege.
>>>
>>> “The Post did not find evidence that Joe Biden personally benefited
>>> from or knew details about the transactions with CEFC [the Chinese
>>> energy conglomerate], which took place after he had left the vice
>>> presidency and before he announced his intentions to run for the
>>> White House in 2020,” the article states.
>>>
>>> It took both the Post and the Times nearly two years to report a
>>> story that was vetted and authenticated by the New York Post’s
>>> Emma-Jo Morris in the fall of 2020. Morris is now Breitbart News’s
>>> political editor.
>>>
>>> The Times and the Post’s decision not to report on Hunter’s
>>> damning string of texts is not surprising. The reported texts could
>>> reveal the core of an entrenched business enterprise. More
>>> importantly, the reported texts could connect the current president
>>> of the United States to the family’s corrupt business dealings.
>>>
>>>
>>> According to the Associated Press, Hunter is currently under
>>> investigation for tax fraud. The Times reported Hunter in 2021 paid
>>> an outstanding $1 million IRS tax bill to evade conviction or a long
>>> sentence.
>>>
>>> Constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley believes a special counsel
>>> should be appointed to probe Hunter’s corruption, because Joe Biden
>>> has denied any wrongdoing by Hunter and may have influenced the
>>> ongoing investigation."
>>>
>> and then up your bum
> 
> that's your specialty.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
you're right , i specialize in telling people to take it up their bum 
but you took it too far you're not really supposed to do it