Re: They graduated from Stanford. Due to AI, they can't find a job

Anonymous <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]: 

> Mitchell Holman wrote:
>> Anonymous <[email protected]> wrote in news:10ielt4$10mkp$1
>> @news.tcpreset.net:
>> 
>>> Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>> Anonymous <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>> news:[email protected]:
>>>>
>>>>> Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>> Larry Parker <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>>>> news:[email protected]:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Stanford computer science graduates are discovering their
>>>>>>> degrees 
>> no
>>>>>>> longer guarantee jobs as AI coding tools now outpace entry-level
>>>>>>> programmers.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tech companies are replacing ten junior developers with just two
>>>>>>> experienced engineers and an AI agent capable of equivalent
>>>>>>> productivity.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Facing a weaker job market, recent graduates are turning to
>>>>>>> master’s programs, less prestigious employers, and startup
>>>>>>> ventures to survive.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A Stanford software engineering degree used to be a golden
>>>>>>> ticket. Artificial intelligence has devalued it to bronze,
>>>>>>> recent graduates say.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The elite students are shocked by the lack of job offers as they
>>>>>>> finish studies at what is often ranked as the top university in
>>>>>>> America.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When they were freshmen, ChatGPT hadn’t yet been released upon
>> the
>>>>>>> world. Today, AI can code better than most humans.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Top tech companies just don’t need as many fresh graduates.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2025-12-19/they-graduated-
>> from
>>>>>>> -s tanford-due-to-ai-they-cant-find-job
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>        Watch for the blame-the-victim conservatives
>>>>>> to claim they "picked the wrong degree course"
>>>>>> and "they should have kept up with the market"
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Or they could simply NOT go to university in the first place.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>        You think high school is all the education
>>>> anyone needs? Seriously?
> 
> With that statement, you are implicitly admitting that the entire K-12
> public school system is worse than useless, and serves only to piss
> away trillions of taxpayer dollars.


      What is your alternative?


> 
>>> The public school system doesn't educate, and should be eliminated.
>>>
>> 
>>       We need presidents who only went to
>> private schools and thus got a "proper"
>> education. Like Barak Obama.
> 
> Private schools in general share the structure of how public schools
> operate. 
> 
> Children should be home schooled.

  
     Grand, assuming every household can 
afford to have a parent staying home all 
day. 


>  At the beginning of biological
> adolescence, they can take a test that separates the top 1/3rd in
> intelligence from the rest. That 1/3rd is eligible to go to something
> resembling elite boarding high schools. Only the top 1/3rd of THOSE
> students graduate, with the top ten percent of them being eligible for
> elite education at a university. 


     You mean elitist. Even Bush admitted he was
only a "C-average" student whild attending elite
private schools because of his parents infulence. 


> 
> Suffice it to say, Obama never would have gotten into high school
> under such a system. Most people would rely on apprenticeships after
> homeschooling, and then internships.


     OBama made it to top rank of scholarship,
the Harvard Law Review, with no help from a 
rich daddykins or "legacy admissions". Bush's
grads were so bad even the University of Texas
law school rejected him.