Re: They graduated from Stanford. Due to AI, they can't find a job

Mitchell Holman wrote:
> Anonymous <[email protected]> wrote in
> news:[email protected]:
> 
>> Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>> Anonymous <[email protected]> wrote in news:10ielt4$10mkp$1
>>> @news.tcpreset.net:
>>>
>>>> Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>> Anonymous <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>>> news:[email protected]:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>>> Larry Parker <[email protected]> wrote in
>>>>>>> news:[email protected]:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Stanford computer science graduates are discovering their
>>>>>>>> degrees
>>> no
>>>>>>>> longer guarantee jobs as AI coding tools now outpace entry-level
>>>>>>>> programmers.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Tech companies are replacing ten junior developers with just two
>>>>>>>> experienced engineers and an AI agent capable of equivalent
>>>>>>>> productivity.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Facing a weaker job market, recent graduates are turning to
>>>>>>>> master’s programs, less prestigious employers, and startup
>>>>>>>> ventures to survive.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A Stanford software engineering degree used to be a golden
>>>>>>>> ticket. Artificial intelligence has devalued it to bronze,
>>>>>>>> recent graduates say.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The elite students are shocked by the lack of job offers as they
>>>>>>>> finish studies at what is often ranked as the top university in
>>>>>>>> America.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> When they were freshmen, ChatGPT hadn’t yet been released upon
>>> the
>>>>>>>> world. Today, AI can code better than most humans.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Top tech companies just don’t need as many fresh graduates.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2025-12-19/they-graduated-
>>> from
>>>>>>>> -s tanford-due-to-ai-they-cant-find-job
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>         Watch for the blame-the-victim conservatives
>>>>>>> to claim they "picked the wrong degree course"
>>>>>>> and "they should have kept up with the market"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Or they could simply NOT go to university in the first place.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>         You think high school is all the education
>>>>> anyone needs? Seriously?
>>
>> With that statement, you are implicitly admitting that the entire K-12
>> public school system is worse than useless, and serves only to piss
>> away trillions of taxpayer dollars.
> 
> 
>        What is your alternative?

Already provided.

>>>> The public school system doesn't educate, and should be eliminated.
>>>>
>>>
>>>        We need presidents who only went to
>>> private schools and thus got a "proper"
>>> education. Like Barak Obama.
>>
>> Private schools in general share the structure of how public schools
>> operate.
>>
>> Children should be home schooled.
> 
>    
>       Grand, assuming every household can
> afford to have a parent staying home all
> day.

Dismantle all the economic scams and left wing repression, and the cost
of housing, medical care and education will plummet.

>>   At the beginning of biological
>> adolescence, they can take a test that separates the top 1/3rd in
>> intelligence from the rest. That 1/3rd is eligible to go to something
>> resembling elite boarding high schools. Only the top 1/3rd of THOSE
>> students graduate, with the top ten percent of them being eligible for
>> elite education at a university.
> 
> 
>       You mean elitist. Even Bush admitted he was
> only a "C-average" student whild attending elite
> private schools because of his parents infulence.

Ivy League graduates today are even dumber.

>> Suffice it to say, Obama never would have gotten into high school
>> under such a system. Most people would rely on apprenticeships after
>> homeschooling, and then internships.
> 
> 
>       OBama made it to top rank of scholarship,
> the Harvard Law Review, with no help from a
> rich daddykins or "legacy admissions". Bush's
> grads were so bad even the University of Texas
> law school rejected him.

Obama's family had government connections, and Obama himself somehow got a
degree from Columbia without ever showing up.