Re: How to use scanned signature in AutoCad r13?

wf dai <[email protected]> Wed, 5 May 2021 02:11:47 -0700 (PDT)
Newsgroups alt.cad.autocad
Message-ID <[email protected]>
=E5=9C=A8 1996=E5=B9=B411=E6=9C=888=E6=97=A5=E6=98=9F=E6=9C=9F=E4=BA=94 UTC=
+8 =E4=B8=8B=E5=8D=884:00:00=EF=BC=8C<M. H. Lyle, PE> =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=
=BC=9A
> "Chris Raffaelli" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >Here is a thought:
> >I scanned my signature and inserted it on the drawing. It then plotted i=
t.
> > The printing is some and I start stamping away......Someday, someone ge=
t
> >ahold of my stamped original.......$15.00 will buy you a stamp. And
> >bingo......'aurthoized drawing' are back in circulation!
> >Just a thought
> >Chris
> >Bob Mills <[email protected]> wrote in article
> ><[email protected]>...
> >> On Fri, 01 Nov 1996 21:13:00 GMT, [email protected] (Malcolm H.
> >> Lyle III, PE) wrote:
> >>=20
> >>=20
> >> >PS - if your using a scanned signature for a seal, it's not binding.
> >> >PE/Architect seals must be wet (by pen, by the person).
> >> >--
> >> > M. H. Lyle, PE
> >> > [email protected]
> >> >
> >>=20
> >> Depends on what state you're in (I'm always in confusion). Here in
> >> California it is allowed to have the seal as part of your CAD drawing.
> >> Signatures have to be original.
> >>=20
> >> What I did to get scanned signatures into AutoCAD was to run the
> >> scanned image through Corel's Trace (assuming signature is smaller
> >> than 8.5x11 <grin>). CorelDraw can, then, output a .DXF file for
> >> AutoCAD. Do MINOR cleanup in either program. Emphasis (SP?) on
> >> MINOR!! Final product SHOULD look like original (no matter HOW ugly
> >> it might have been).
> >>=20
> >> Bob Mills
> >> [email protected]
> >>=20
> >>
> --
> Per Virginia DOPR Regulations:
> Section 12.8.B.1
> "All seal imprints on final documents shall bear an originial
> signature and date"
> The reason for this is to prevent a subordiante of yours from pirating
> your seal and signature.
> I believe you are breaking the law ... in my state, and probably in
> yours as well
> --
> M. H. Lyle, PE
> [email protected]
OMG 1996 serious?