Re: Federal Prisons Are Beginning to Force Trans Inmates Off Hormone Therapy

zendejo <[email protected]> Tue, 26 May 2026 16:33:08 -0600
Newsgroups alt.california.illegals,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.global-warming,comp.os.linux.advocacy,or.politics,talk.politics.guns
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 5/26/26 4:07 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
> On May 26, 2026 at 3:02:49 PM MST, "zendejo" wrote
> <[email protected]>:
> 
>> On 5/26/26 3:24 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
>>> On May 26, 2026 at 1:22:31 PM MST, "zendejo" wrote
>>> <[email protected]>:
>>>
>>>> On 5/26/26 2:03 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <[email protected]>,
>>>>> [email protected] says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On May 26, 2026 at 10:08:21 AM MST, "zendejo" wrote
>>>>>> <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 5/26/26 10:26 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
>>>>>>>> On May 26, 2026 at 7:04:20 AM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In article <[email protected]>,
>>>>>>>>> [email protected] says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On May 25, 2026 at 1:24:09 PM MST, "zendejo" wrote
>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/25/26 11:13 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On May 25, 2026 at 8:39:45 AM MST, "zendejo" wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.history.com/articles/how-the-nazis-were-inspired-by-jim-crow?utm_source=chatgpt.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It ought not be lost that Henry Ford's famed River Rouge assembly line
>>>>>>>>>>>>> was the model Hitler adopted for the KDF/Volkswagen.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> True. Though using his tech / ideas does not necessarily mean they were
>>>>>>>>>>>> aligned.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Just when it sounds like you could get one right:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> But they WERE aligned.
>>>>>>>>>>> ^ this ^
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Dolthead:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> AI Overview
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Several American business executives met with Adolf Hitler during the
>>>>>>>>>>> 1930s and early 1940s as corporate leaders sought to protect their
>>>>>>>>>>> investments and navigate the rising Nazi regime.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Notice you snip, ran, and used an ad hominem.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In short: your white flag is getting more tattered.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> As you do everything to avoid the topic.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I might be the one who offers the most evidence and verifiable sources than
>>>>>>>> anyone else in these forums. Your claim is absurd.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your manifest solipsism and complete detachment from reality is noted -
>>>>>>> again.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> =============================================================================
>>>>>>>> True. Though using his tech / ideas does not necessarily mean they were
>>>>>>>> aligned.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just when it sounds like you could get one right:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But they WERE aligned.
>>>>>>> ^ this ^
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dolthead:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> AI Overview
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Several American business executives met with Adolf Hitler during the
>>>>>>> 1930s and early 1940s as corporate leaders sought to protect their
>>>>>>> investments and navigate the rising Nazi regime.
>>>>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So others were wrong and that excuses Ford for his being more wrong? What is
>>>>>> your point?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Other than that you side with MAGA and the white supremacists and Nazis.
>>>>>
>>>>> More racism from the faggot racist.
>>>>
>>>> But by golly he just loves to build and burn his strawmen.
>>>>
>>>> https://youtu.be/GRKaAiBy-Go
>>>
>>> You lash out because you cannot defend your views.
>>
>> You retreat and lie because my defenses are impenetrable.
>>
>>> Mine are easy to defend:
>>>
>>> * Equal rights regardless of sex or gender or race or ethnicity or religion or
>>> nationality ...
>>> * Reduce pollution.
>>> * Accept science and evidence.
>>
>> Those aren't "views" per se - they're largely malformed regurgitations
>> of leftard dogmas.
>>
>> Oddly those same leftards are *corrupting science* into what they want
>> it to be.
>>
>> https://www.epw.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/4/a/4a86454f-4287-4d1c-ae5f-85a01b8c78b8/7E90482A76C15A7B2D2473E6EDC911C0.refuting-12-claims-made-by-climate-alarmists.pdf
>>
>> Alarmist Claim #1: Antarctic Peninsula is shrinking
>> FACT: 2008 peer-reviewed paper in American Geophysical Union found “a
>> doubling in snow accumulation in
>> the western Antarctic Peninsula since 1850.”
>> Alarmist Claim #2: Glaciers are melting throughout the world.
>> FACT: A UN Report in 2010 reported that “glaciers increasing despite
>> climate change… glaciers in many areas of
>> the world are increasing.”
>> Alarmist Claim #3: The IPCC stated the Himalayan glaciers would melt by
>> 2035. .
>> FACT: The IPCC got that unsubstantiated and false statistic from a World
>> Wildlife Federation brochure. In
>> January 2010, Time magazine article, Himalayan Melting, How a Climate
>> Panel Got it Wrong: “Glaciergate” is a
>> “black eye for the IPCC and the climate-science community as a whole.”
>> Alarmist Claim #4: Polar Bears are disappearing.
>> FACT: Director of Wildlife Research with the Arctic Government of
>> Nunavut: “Of 13 populations of polar bears
>>    in Canada, 11 are stable or increasing in number. They are not going
>> extinct, or even appear to be affected at
>>    present.”
>> FACT: In the 50’s and 60’s there were between 5,000 and 10,000 polar
>> bears. Today there are between 15,000 and
>> 25,000.
>> Alarmist Claim #5: May 2013, President Obama claimed the climate is
>> warming faster than anybody anticipated five or 10 years ago.”
>> FACT: Nature reported “For the period [1998-2012] the observed trend of
>> temperatures is … not significantly
>> different from zero and suggests a temporary hiatus in global warming.”
>> FACT: The Economist reported “over the past 15 years, air temperatures
>> at the Earth’s surface have been flat …”
>> Alarmist Claim #6: 2014 was the warmest year in modern record by 0.02
>> degree.
>> FACT: Only a “38% chance 2014 was the warmest year on record.” Margin of
>> error, which on average is 0.1 degree
>> Celsius, made “impossible to conclude 2014 was the warmest year”
>> according to the Berkeley Earth Surface
>> Temperature (BEST) project stated,
>> Alarmist Claim #7: In 2000, Democrats started saying that the science is
>> settled.
>> FACT: I started getting phone calls from scientists disagreeing so I
>> made a speech on the floor showing how many
>> scientists disagreed.
>> Alarmist Claim #8: Global warming is causing more tornadoes.
>> FACT: A NOAA scientist rejected global warming link to tornados stating
>> “no specific consensus or connection
>> between global warming and tornadic activity.”
>> Alarmist Claim #9: Global warming is causing hurricanes to increase in
>> intensity and frequency.
>> FACT: Geophysical Research Letters found “since 2006 tropical cyclone
>> energy has decreased dramatically” to the
>> lowest levels since the 1970s. Global frequency of tropical cyclones has
>> reached a historic low.
>> Alarmist Claim #10: Global warming is leading to an increased number of
>> droughts.
>> FACT: IPCC Fifth Assessment report, previous “conclusions regarding
>> global increasing trend in drought since
>> the 1970s were probably overstated.”
>> Alarmist Claim #11: Global warming is causing sea levels to rise at a
>> rapid pace.
>> FACT: Journal of Geophysical Research found “there has been no
>> statistically significant acceleration in sea level
>> rise over the past 100 plus years.”
>> Alarmist Claim #12: 97% of scientists agree global warming is manmade.
>> FACT: WSJ found the 97% consensus to be predicated on “a handful of
>> surveys and abstract-counting exercises
>> that have been contradicted by more reliable research.”
>>
>>
>>> There are devils in the details, of course, but really simple and easy to
>>> defend. Does not lead to the anger you struggle with.
>>
>> Now you're just engaging in transference, so trivial you are.
> 
> This has been responded to, in detail, and you snipped and ran.

This has been denied, in artless idiocy.

> In short: you know your claims are not accurate but you do not care.
> 
> I say evidence matters.

You have none, so...