Re: Federal Prisons Are Beginning to Force Trans Inmates Off Hormone Therapy

In article <[email protected]>, 
[email protected] says...
> 
> On May 26, 2026 at 7:25:37 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> <[email protected]>:
> 
> > In article <[email protected]>,
> > [email protected] says...
> 
> ...
> >>>> 
> >>>> Mine are easy to defend:
> >>>> 
> >>>> * Equal rights regardless of sex or gender or race or ethnicity or religion or
> >>>> nationality ...
> >>> 
> >>> So? Who doesn't have those rights?
> >> 
> >> Immigrants, women, non-whites, the poor, etc.
> > 
> > Yes they do, unless they break the law.
> 
> Please back this claim. Show where they get equality.
> 
> And you will fail. 100% predictable.

It's the truth and you know it. Just because you are 
racist doesn't mean everyone is,
> 
> >>> 
> >>>> * Accept science and evidence.
> >>> 
> >>> Twisted science and scientists have been know to lie.
> >> 
> >> You reject science. Thanks for admitting my point.
> > 
> > I study science all the time. Why can we never reach
> > absolute zero? What is entropy?
> 
> Science has shown that if you can freeze yourself to -459.67ºF you will be 0K.

You can't reach absolute zero. It's not possible. Science 
prove that. Nice spin on your part.
> 
> But back to the topic... I look to science / evidence on climate, how equal
> people are treated, gender topics, economics, public health, immigration and
> crime, crime statistics, evolution, welfare and social spending, gun violence,
> etc. On each of these the left TENDS to be closer to agreeing with the
> evidence -- to be informed by evidence and equal rights. Tends. Neither side
> is perfect, and it would be a mistake to assume the left / right sides align
> with the two major parties.

You are a load of shit. Maybe on here you try to make 
people believe that.
> 
> I tend to go with evidence... left wingers tend to be OK with that. Right
> wingers HATE it. They hate evidence. They hate equal rights.

How so? You ignore evidence against your side and blame 
the right with no evidence at all.
> 
> Keep in mind the main differences between liberal and conservative world
> views:
> 
> * Liberals: support equal rights and environmental protection, with a focus on
> investing in the future and building a stronger tie between productivity and
> financial reward.

LOL  That is a crock.
> 
> Liberals want evidence-based regulation and oversight to help ensure clean air
> and water, safe food, and human rights. This includes following the scientific
> evidence about climate change and food safety, and things like setting levels
> of lead and other harmful substances allowed, and even to wanting to do
> research to reduce the harm of tools such as cars and guns and swimming pools.
> This is a form of control, and conservatives are right to note that. And they
> are right to note that sometimes these measures are taken too far.
> 
> * Conservative: support special entitlements for whites, Christians, males,
> heterosexuals, those in lower populated states, and the wealthy, with a focus
> on redistributing wealth to the very richest in the nation with the idea that
> this will somehow help others.
> 
> Conservatives want regulation and oversight based on their own feelings and
> what they believe has historically existed (which is often incorrect), or even
> just based on their own religion. This includes controlling which consenting
> adults can marry each other, what a woman can do with her own body, and even
> insisting the government gets to define YOUR gender. They also work to create
> regulations on voting to limit who can vote, for if the people truly get a
> voice they know their ideas are less likely to be accepted. Liberals are right
> to call conservatives out on this also being a form of control and, I think, a
> less defensible one.
> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> There are devils in the details, of course, but really simple and easy to
> >>>> defend. Does not lead to the anger you struggle with.
> >>> 
> >>> Come here legally and you will be welcome.
> >> 
> >> This is clearly NOT true, but also misses a LOT of nuance and history. In
> >> short: it is an ignorant bumper sticker way of thinking -- that promises white
> >> supremacy.
> > 
> > Come legally or you lose any right you think you had.
> 
> That is contrary to the law.

Nope. What part of "legally" don't you understand?