Re: Federal Prisons Are Beginning to Force Trans Inmates Off Hormone Therapy
zendejo <[email protected]> Wed, 27 May 2026 09:53:58 -0600
| Newsgroups | alt.california.illegals,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.os.linux.advocacy,or.politics,talk.politics.guns,sci.environment,alt.global-warming |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 5/26/26 10:05 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote: > Liberals want evidence-based regulation and oversight to help ensure clean air > and water, safe food, and human rights. This includes following the scientific > evidence about climate change and food safety, and things like Like THIS: https://www.heritage.org/environment/commentary/follow-the-climate-change-money How big is the Climate Change Industrial Complex today? Surprisingly, no one seems to be keeping track of all the channels of funding. A few years ago Forbes magazine went through the federal budget and estimated about $150 billion in spending on climate change and green energy subsidies during President Obama’s first term. That didn’t include the tax subsidies that provide a 30 percent tax credit for wind and solar power — so add to those numbers about $8 billion to $10 billion a year. Then add billions more in costs attributable to the 29 states with renewable energy mandates that require utilities to buy expensive “green” energy. Worldwide the numbers are gargantuan. Five years ago, a leftist group called the Climate Policy Initiative issued a study which found that “Global investment in climate change” reached $359 billion that year. Then to give you a sense of how money-hungry these planet-saviors are, the CPI moaned that this spending “falls far short of what’s needed” a number estimated at $5 trillion. For $5 trillion we could feed everyone on the planet, end malaria, and provide clean water and reliable electricity to every remote village in Africa. And we would probably have enough money left over to find a cure for cancer and Alzheimers.