Re: Newsom signs anti-ICE bill banning federal law enforcement from wearing masks
Michael Ejercito <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | talk.politics.guns,talk.politics.misc,soc.culture.usa,soc.culture.israel,alt.california |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Klaus Schadenfreude wrote: > [Default] "Scout" <[email protected]> typed: > >> >> >> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentö[email protected]> wrote >> in message >> news:5503dk5hfgg0mnikt21hc57kv8qu10ao1k@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com... >>> [Default] Michael Ejercito <[email protected]> typed: >>> >>>> https://nypost.com/2025/09/20/us-news/california-bans-all-masking-including-by-ice-agents/ >>>> >>>> Newsom signs anti-ICE bill banning federal law enforcement from wearing >>>> masks >>> >>> Laugh laugh laugh laugh. >> >> As long as wearing a mask while engaged in a crime is made a felony which is >> applied onto any punishment from their crimes. >> >> You were arrested for breaking a window during a 'mostly peaceful protest' >> 30 days in jail and $500 restitution, but you were wearing a mask so that >> becomes a mandatory 30 days plus one year in prison. >> >> If the police can't wear masks... then neither should the criminals. >> >> Now let hear them cry as they claim that is somehow 'different'.. because >> criminals have a right not to be identified. >> > > It will be entertaining if Newsom tries to arrest ICE agents and Trump > sends in the National Guard to protect them. > A The Siege situation would be liberating. Michael