Re: OT: Warning: California's Vehicle Code _5201

Roger Rhino <[email protected]> Sat, 18 Apr 2026 16:42:39 -0700
Newsgroups alt.home.repair,alt.california,sac.politics,fl.politics,fl.general,miami.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
"Dr. Emil Jaccard" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Roger Rhino <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > This bit of screed was about the economics of who pays how much toll.
> > Nothing there about a constitutional right to travel.
> > 
> > The constitution does address such rights, but you'll be the last to
> > find it.  Unfortunately for you, there's still no right to a free ride.
> > Do keep looking.
> 
> You are NOT terribly smart:
> 
> AI Overview
> The U.S. Constitution, while not explicitly mentioning "travel," is
> interpreted by the Supreme Court to guarantee a fundamental right to
> interstate travel. This right, rooted in the 14th Amendment’s

(snip AI screed)

The right to travel is rooted in the 9th amendment before that.

All of which is beside the point, which you missed entirely.  The
nutcase was arguing that his right to travel granted him toll-free use
of toll roads.  That's just one froot-loop short of the Sovereign
Citizen narrative that they have the right to drive on publically owned
roads without the burden of driver's license or vehicle registration.