Re: T-Mobile Sprint Merger: Say goodbye to scam calls
nospam <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.android,alt.cellular |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <050820202208251530%[email protected]> |
In article <[email protected]>, JF Mezei <[email protected]> wrote: > > nope. everything is lte now, which t-mobile and sprint fully support > > and have for years, although different bands. > > Supporting LTE is one thing. Supporting VoLTE is anther. they support both and have for years. stop making up shit. > Many LTE phones > don't have VolTE or support for VoLTE on T-Mo/Sprint. nonsense. nearly everything in the past 5 years supports volte. stop making up shit. > (think older phones, alnd also embeded devices). embedded devices aren't used for calls. > Remember that Sprint has a lot of MVNOs that target the low end. not really, but so what? they'll buy a refurb iphone or android phone. > A handset that doesn't have LTE bands for T-Mo, Sprint and Verizon is > not likely t also have supported VoLTE. complete nonsense. stop making up shit. > Of those that have VoLTE supported on the new T-Mo network, they likely > have all the bands needed to opperated on T-Mo/Sprint as well as AT&T or > Verizon. recent iphones have all lte bands. some android phones do, but most have a subset, sometimes only one carrier. > > nonsense. nobody needs to shop around for lte. why do you make up such > > shit?? > > The combined T-Mo and Sprint networks will still have a smaller footprnt > compared to either At&T and Verizon. So will T-Mo still have a need to > be able to roam onto the larger network? not only do you not answer the question but you make up even more shit. > > there is no roaming revenue. > > Ar you kidding me? AT&T or Verizon allowing T-Mo to roam on their > network brings in lots of cash. But it is a marketing issue because > their advantage of having better coverage is less marked. you snipped to alter context again.