Maps to Compare AT&T, T-Mobile, US Cellular, & Verizon Mobile Coverage and US State of the Mobile Union 1H 2021
sms <[email protected]> Tue, 5 Oct 2021 13:05:38 -0700
| Newsgroups | misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.android,alt.cellular |
|---|---|
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
There are now three (at least) maps that let you quickly compare coverage between networks. FCC Map: <https://fcc.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=6c1b2e73d9d749cdb7bc88a0d1bdd25b> RootMetrics Map: <https://webcoveragemap.rootmetrics.com/en-US> WhistleOut Map: <https://www.whistleout.com/CellPhones/Guides/Coverage> US State of the Mobile Union 1H 2021; Carrier performance at national, state, and metro levels: <https://assets.ctfassets.net/ob7bbcsqy5m2/5RH6DcqWKrNjbfGDPkfWkb/677aec385a91e8f1859703242aff739e/RootMetrics_US_State-of-Mobile-Union-1H_2021-FINAL.pdf> The coverage maps and analysis confirm my own experiences. Over the years I've had cellular service from many different carriers: GTE Mobilnet, Cellular One, AT&T (old), Pac Bell Wireless, Cingular, AT&T (new), T-Mobile, Verizon, and several MVNOs or carrier-owned prepaid services: Page Plus (Verizon), Consumer Cellular (AT&T), Cricket (AT&T), and Total Wireless (Verizon). Pac Bell Wireless was by far the worst. It was the first GSM network in my area, and operated at 1900 MHz so in-building coverage was worse than networks using 850 MHz bands. They offered very attractive pricing when they launched, but were over-subscribed and unable to provide sufficient capacity. Pac Bell Wireless was acquired by Cingular when SBC acquired Pacific Bell, then sold to T-Mobile when Cingular bought AT&T. T-Mobile was not good because of coverage issues in the western U.S., and the maps and the Rootmetrics report confirm that these coverage issues still exist outside of urban areas. Consumer Cellular and Cricket, both on AT&T worked fine but Consumer Cellular, at the time, had no data plans with a sufficient amount of data for family plans. Now Consumer Cellular is very expensive for plans with sufficient quantities of data, plus they now limit the number of lines on an account to only three. Cricket worked fine but at the time did not offer hotspot, and also they throttled data to 8Mb/s. Cricket now offers unlimited, unthrottled, data, and includes 15GB of hotspot data per line, but the price has gone up to $33 per line on a four line plan (they originally offered 5 lines for $100, ($20 per line)). I’m currently using Total Wireless with 100GB of shared data per month on four lines, with 10GB of hotspot data per line, for a little under $100 per month including taxes and fees. Downsides of Total Wireless are a) no international roaming, not even to Canada and Mexico, b) no eSIM support (most MVNOs lack eSIM support), and c) no Apple Watch support (which requires eSIM support). Verizon is in the process of trying to buy all the América Móvil brands in the U.S., including Total Wireless <https://www.lightreading.com/ossbsscx/verizon-to-broaden-out-prepaid-offerings/d/d-id/772053>.