Re: 5G map
Andy Burnelli <[email protected]> Tue, 5 Apr 2022 00:31:13 +0100
| Newsgroups | misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.android,alt.cellular |
|---|---|
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
badgolferman wrote: >>Takes only 30 seconds. > > I would have to agree with you. What's revealing is that it's rare for either you or me to call someone a liar (since we reserve those words for someone who does so repeatedly). I know you, badgolferman, conscientiously posted your T-Mobile 5G test results multiple times - both good and bad - as did I - so I know that you know what I know which is often summarized on Usenet as the age-old saying: "*pics or it didn't happen*" You posted multiple pics of your speeds on your new iPhone. I too posted mine (very many in fact - because speeds vary by a lot) <https://i.postimg.cc/4dDhFK5F/speedtest01.jpg> *125Mbps* <https://i.postimg.cc/vT68k3BW/speedtest02.jpg> *181Mbps* <https://i.postimg.cc/pdXF4Mtz/speedtest03.jpg> *125Mbps* to *181Mbps* <https://i.postimg.cc/gcsyc4Vn/speedtest04.jpg> *82Mbps* & -88dBM <https://i.postimg.cc/mggy315q/speedtest05.jpg> *254Mbps* <https://i.postimg.cc/43KvqkZQ/speedtest06.jpg> *255Mbps* <https://i.postimg.cc/zf9w1tGZ/speedtest07.jpg> *255Mbps* <https://i.postimg.cc/Bb3xjjFm/speedtest08.jpg> *255Mbps* <https://i.postimg.cc/GhZKX0vZ/speedtest09.jpg> *130Mbps* <https://i.postimg.cc/28yZdQJR/speedtest10.jpg> *81Mbps* <https://i.postimg.cc/ydnDcxy8/speedtest11.jpg> *79Mbps* to *81Mbps* <https://i.postimg.cc/5y063Jsq/speedtest12.jpg> *96Mbps* to *109Mbps* <https://i.postimg.cc/fbNyPmHb/speedtest13.jpg> *109Mbps* <https://i.postimg.cc/5tSyWyGS/speedtest14.jpg> *88Mbps* to *102Mbps* <https://i.postimg.cc/C5vgmtRd/speedtest15.jpg> *130Mbps* to *255Mbps* <https://i.postimg.cc/W3GgYJtZ/speedtest16.jpg> *125Mbps* to *181Mbps* <https://i.postimg.cc/nVs0Smw8/speedtest17.jpg> *54Mbps* <https://i.postimg.cc/N0fx62rz/speedtest18.jpg> *60Mbps* & -85dBm Notice I don't post just _one_ speed like Steve does, to prove a point. I post many speeds, which vary by a lot, like it or not. That's what they do. All those speeds were taken at the same spot - and yet they vary. By a lot. With Steve, he types one number and claims that's all the time. With Steve, the pics he posts are cherry-picked unattributed maps. They don't even have a date on them (they could be ten years old). And whenever he claims his T-Mobile vs Verizon speeds, it's always text. While it takes 30 seconds to post text, it takes 30 seconds to post proof. Here, for example, is a screenshot I made moments ago for another thread. <https://i.postimg.cc/66L724vh/speedtest20.jpg> Meteor test log results You can trust me because I'm not only credible (I don't care if T-Mobile or Verizon or AT&T is "better" at any one spot - I just want to post the facts), but also because I prove more than almost anyone, what I claim. <https://i.postimg.cc/qR4BcjfM/speedtest19.jpg> Ookla test log results Steve never does. Steve is the consummate politician. For years Steve lied about the FCC maps (which didn't show what he said). Now he's lying about his differential speeds (which he simply typed up). Takes 30 seconds for Steve to lie. Takes 30 seconds for Steve to tell the truth. It doesn't cost Steve any more effort to tell the truth than for him to lie. And yet, lie he does. That's fine, by the way. He's allowed to lie to all of us all of the time. But we don't have to believe him when he does. Me? I don't care if T-Mobile is faster or slower than Verizon. Nobody pays me to shill for either one of them. I just care what is. -- The problem with people like Steve who is a politician and a consummate liar, is they forget not everyone is so stupid as to believe their lies.