Re: Do these cellular amplifiers work for all cellphones?
David Woolley <[email protected]> Sun, 10 Apr 2022 19:02:37 +0100
| Newsgroups | misc.phone.mobile.iphone,alt.cellular,uk.telecom.mobile |
|---|---|
| Organization | No affiliation |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 10/04/2022 18:15, RJH wrote: > he 2022 PC Magazine vehicle cellular boosters review specifically describes > the "uplink" as the "connection that goes first" when you are at "the edges > of cell coverage" which they defined as somewhere around below -110dBm. I'd consider mobile to fixed to be the uplink, but the -110dBm will me measured at the mobile end of the fixed to mobile direction. > > Even the cheapest vehicle cell signal booster which is an on-the-dash device > has 23dB of gain, which should theoretically boost that weak -110dBm signal > into a respectable range in the mid eighties for that uplink (assuming they > were honest in their FCC certification, which we have to believe is true). The limit on signal quality will be set by signal to noise ratio, and only indirectly by power level. -110dBm represents the power level at which the signal to noise level gets to be unacceptable for an antenna that is in the open. Boosting it by 23dB isn't going to improve SNR, except to the extent that the booster receiver has lower noise front end, and, even then, there is probably going to be very little benefit beyond about 5dB of gain, even for an ideal receiver. The technical spec of the first product on the web page was silent about noise figures, so it may well have no better a front end than the mobile itself, in which case the SNR will be worse. The main purpose seems to be to compensate for the losses caused by the car body, reducing the signal, but that is somewhat equivalent to the old way of feeding an external aerial to a docking unit, allowing the phone to directly use the external aerial. To some extent this is going to be an expensive way of compensating for the lack of an antenna socket on modern phones. The external antenna will be better than the internal one in the phone, so that should be a benefit. A 23dB boost, on the same frequency risks the retransmission being received on the external antenna, so I can't really see why you would want to uses so much gain, except as a numbers game. 23dB mobile to fixed would introduce safety problems in terms of jamming car electronics and exposure to pedestrians (if used when parked).