Re: Google employee barred from promotion ‘for being a White man’
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.politics.misc,alt.censorship,comp.misc,comp.internet.services.google |
|---|---|
| Organization | i2pn2 (i2pn.org) |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024, Julieta Shem wrote: > D <[email protected]> writes: > >> On Tue, 27 Feb 2024, Anton Shepelev wrote: >> >>> D: >>> >>>> I would assume there is no iron clad proof of this. On the >>>> other hand, as I tell people I know who experienced the >>>> same due to gender or nationality, you don't want to >>>> remain at that company anyway so paradoxically you should >>>> be happy it happened so you can move on to a company that >>>> is more aligned with your values and interests. >>> >>> That's selfish. The existance of such companies is harmful >>> to the entire humanity, not only to persons with differing >>> values. >> >> No, it's rational. Companies are private property and therefore the >> owner may do with them what they wish. The market will sort out >> companies who reject competent employees in time, and companies who >> accept competent employees regardless of color will thrive. >> >> The entity that makes this a problem is the government. > > But isn't government put together by companies? > No it's politicians. What differentiates government and companies is that government govern countries and are back with violence. What defines a company is that it acts on markets and have customers who can voluntarily choose to do business or not with the company.