Re: No 1st Amendment in Vietnam - New Suppression/Spy Laws

Michael Ejercito <[email protected]> Fri, 27 Dec 2024 20:51:52 -0800
Newsgroups talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.censorship,soc.culture.israel
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Loose Cannon wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 07:51:00 -0800, Michael Ejercito
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Loose Cannon wrote:
>>> On Wed, 25 Dec 2024 15:13:22 -0500, "[email protected]"
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> https://www.dw.com/en/vietnams-restrictive-internet-law-comes-into-force/a-71156662
>>>>
>>>> A controversial internet law that gives the government power
>>>> to regulate online content takes effect Wednesday, with rights
>>>> groups saying the move is aimed at stifling dissent.
>>>>
>>>> Decree 147 expands government control over access to information
>>>> on the internet for reasons of "national security" and "social
>>>> order."
>>>>
>>>> The law requires social media platforms providing services to
>>>> users in Vietnam to store user data and provide it to authorities
>>>> on demand.
>>>>
>>>> The government issued the decree this November, and it
>>>> requires organizations to take down anything the authorities
>>>> consider "illegal content" within 24 hours.
>>>>
>>>> . . .
>>>>
>>>>     Awwww ... somebody sent them a copy of the Democrats
>>>>     playbook !  :-)
>>>>
>>>>     "Disinfo" = Lies the State DOESN'T like.
>>>
>>>
>>> Who gives a rat's ass what gooks do, say or think?
>>     Normal people do.
>>
>>     Normal people do not call other people gooks.
>>   Hopefully when
>>> Trump takes office, he'll deport every slant-eyed cretin back to
>>> whatever Asiatic shithole they come from. However they choose to
>>> govern themselves is fine by me.
>>     You sure have a problem with slant eyes.
>>
>>     Over a billion normal people regularly wake up to a pair of slant
>> eyes every morning,
>>
>>     Mark Zuckerberg is one of them.
>>
>>     So is the woman in this picture.
>>
>>     https://www.instagram.com/p/CsQV2EMu0I1/?img_index=1
> 
> 
> Gook, that picture is disgusting. 
    No, it is not.

In many locales, besiality is a
> crime punishable up to 20 years in prison. You have come very close to
> crossing that line. For Shame!
    There is no bestiality in that photo of a husband and wife and their 
sons!



  Michael