Re: [Spam] neodome [Spam] back [Spam] to [Spam] the [Spam] same [Spam] shit.

On 25 Oct 2025, Radio Eriwan <[email protected]> posted some
news:[email protected]: 

> Fritz Wuehler once wrote, without thinking too much beforehand:
>> Radio Claashole <[email protected]> sent:
>> > A stupid YAMN user wrote:
>> > > Nomen Nescio <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > On 24 Oct 2025, Anonymous <[email protected]> posted
>> > > > some news:[email protected]:
>> > > > 
>> > > > > [Spam] same [Spam] censoring [Spam] shit [Spam] different
>> > > > > [Spam]. 
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > Apparently it's okay for a particular sporging asshole to
>> > > > > destroy groups and services for all, but not okay to use YAMN
>> > > > > / neodome to counter the jerk.
>> > > > 
>> > > > yamn is not so anonymous after all.  
>> > > > 
>> > > > what does that say about "anonymous messaging" hmm?
>> > > 
>> > > Tor is an unsecure real-time system.
>> > > Type I remailing fails to hide message size.
>> > > Only Type II remailing (Mixmaster / YAMN) is secure!
>> > > 
>> > 
>> > Did you know that YAMN/OmniMix users are the dumbest Usenet users?
>> 
>>   We just know that you, fascist Claas, and your buddy GabX are the
>> stupidest snake oil peddlers over here ignoring even the most basic
>> principles of secure anonymous remailing. Good luck to your victims.
>> 
> 
> Ah, ok. So pseudonymous remailing with Mixmaster and YAMN, in your
> eyes, is secure 'anonymous' remailing. Mind you, you must use Tor or
> you would shit in your pants without it. So much for TypeII
> 'anonymous' remailing. 

It all works with Tor.   No Tor, no work.