Re: [Spam] neodome [Spam] back [Spam] to [Spam] the [Spam] same [Spam] shit.

On 26 Oct 2025, Stefan Claas <[email protected]> posted some
news:[email protected]: 

> Gabx wrote:
>> Fritz Wuehler wrote:
>> > Radio Claashole <[email protected]> sent:
>> > > A stupid YAMN user wrote:
>> > > > Nomen Nescio <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > > On 24 Oct 2025, Anonymous <[email protected]> posted
>> > > > > some news:[email protected]:
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > > [Spam] same [Spam] censoring [Spam] shit [Spam] different
>> > > > > > [Spam]. 
>> > > > > > 
>> > > > > > Apparently it's okay for a particular sporging asshole to
>> > > > > > destroy groups and services for all, but not okay to use
>> > > > > > YAMN / neodome to counter the jerk.
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > yamn is not so anonymous after all.
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > what does that say about "anonymous messaging" hmm?
>> > > > 
>> > > > Tor is an unsecure real-time system.
>> > > > Type I remailing fails to hide message size.
>> > > > Only Type II remailing (Mixmaster / YAMN) is secure!
>> > > > 
>> > > 
>> > > Did you know that YAMN/OmniMix users are the dumbest Usenet
>> > > users? 
>> > 
>> >    We just know that you, fascist Claas, and your buddy GabX are
>> >    the 
>> > stupidest snake oil peddlers over here ignoring even the most basic
>> > principles of secure anonymous remailing. Good luck to your
>> > victims. 
>> > 
>> Prove it by code !
> 
> I think this is not possible, because people working at LEA etc. and
> defending old TypeII tech, so that users still use it, need to have
> something for work, i.e looking at decrypted packet flow. So no time
> for coding, only time for propaganda.

There is no such thing as an "anonymous" LEA tip website either.  They 
don't know where the tip came from when they look up the IP Address in 
the logs. Lol!