Re: [Spam] neodome [Spam] back [Spam] to [Spam] the [Spam] same [Spam] shit.

Stefan Claas <[email protected]> wrote:
>Gabx wrote:
>> Fritz Wuehler wrote:
>> > Radio Claashole <[email protected]> sent:
>> > > A stupid YAMN user wrote:
>> > > > Nomen Nescio <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > > On 24 Oct 2025, Anonymous <[email protected]> posted some
>> > > > > news:[email protected]:
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > > [Spam] same [Spam] censoring [Spam] shit [Spam] different [Spam].
>> > > > > > 
>> > > > > > Apparently it's okay for a particular sporging asshole to destroy groups
>> > > > > > and services for all, but not okay to use YAMN / neodome to counter the
>> > > > > > jerk.
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > yamn is not so anonymous after all.
>> > > > > 
>> > > > > what does that say about "anonymous messaging" hmm?
>> > > > 
>> > > > Tor is an unsecure real-time system.
>> > > > Type I remailing fails to hide message size.
>> > > > Only Type II remailing (Mixmaster / YAMN) is secure!
>> > > > 
>> > > 
>> > > Did you know that YAMN/OmniMix users are the dumbest Usenet users?
>> > 
>> >    We just know that you, fascist Claas, and your buddy GabX are the
>> > stupidest snake oil peddlers over here ignoring even the most basic
>> > principles of secure anonymous remailing. Good luck to your victims.
>> > 
>> Prove it by code !
>
>I think this is not possible, because people working at LEA etc. and
>defending old TypeII tech, so that users still use it, need to have
>something for work, i.e looking at decrypted packet flow. So no time
>for coding, only time for propaganda.
>
>Regards
>Stefan

Claas, when will you answer the questions asked in MID
<[email protected]>
and <[email protected]>, which would
make it easier to tell who's the propagandist here and
who's not?