Re: [Spam] neodome [Spam] back [Spam] to [Spam] the [Spam] same [Spam] shit.
Fritz Wuehler <[email protected]> Mon, 27 Oct 2025 00:55:37 +0100
| Newsgroups | alt.anonymous,alt.censorship,alt.privacy.anon-server |
|---|---|
| Organization | dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Gabx <[email protected]> wrote: >Fritz Wuehler wrote: >> Radio Claashole <[email protected]> sent: >>> A stupid YAMN user wrote: >>>> Nomen Nescio <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> On 24 Oct 2025, Anonymous <[email protected]> posted some >>>>> news:[email protected]: >>>>> >>>>>> [Spam] same [Spam] censoring [Spam] shit [Spam] different [Spam]. >>>>>> >>>>>> Apparently it's okay for a particular sporging asshole to destroy groups >>>>>> and services for all, but not okay to use YAMN / neodome to counter the >>>>>> jerk. >>>>> >>>>> yamn is not so anonymous after all. >>>>> >>>>> what does that say about "anonymous messaging" hmm? >>>> >>>> Tor is an unsecure real-time system. >>>> Type I remailing fails to hide message size. >>>> Only Type II remailing (Mixmaster / YAMN) is secure! >>>> >>> >>> Did you know that YAMN/OmniMix users are the dumbest Usenet users? >> >> We just know that you, fascist Claas, and your buddy GabX are the >> stupidest snake oil peddlers over here ignoring even the most basic >> principles of secure anonymous remailing. Good luck to your victims. >> >Prove it by code ! > >Gabx package main import "fmt" func main() { fmt.Println( "GabX and Claas are both ignorant assholes!") }