Re: [Spam] neodome [Spam] back [Spam] to [Spam] the [Spam] same [Spam] shit.

On 26 Oct 2025, Anonymous User <[email protected]> posted some 
news:[email protected]:

> On 26 Oct 2025, Nomen Nescio <[email protected]> posted some
> news:[email protected]: 
> 
>> On 25 Oct 2025, Radio Eriwan <[email protected]> posted some
>> news:[email protected]: 
>> 
>>> Fritz Wuehler once wrote, without thinking too much beforehand:
>>>> Radio Claashole <[email protected]> sent:
>>>> > A stupid YAMN user wrote:
>>>> > > Nomen Nescio <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> > > > On 24 Oct 2025, Anonymous <[email protected]> posted
>>>> > > > some news:[email protected]:
>>>> > > > 
>>>> > > > > [Spam] same [Spam] censoring [Spam] shit [Spam] different
>>>> > > > > [Spam]. 
>>>> > > > > 
>>>> > > > > Apparently it's okay for a particular sporging asshole to
>>>> > > > > destroy groups and services for all, but not okay to use
>>>> > > > > YAMN / neodome to counter the jerk.
>>>> > > > 
>>>> > > > yamn is not so anonymous after all.  
>>>> > > > 
>>>> > > > what does that say about "anonymous messaging" hmm?
>>>> > > 
>>>> > > Tor is an unsecure real-time system.
>>>> > > Type I remailing fails to hide message size.
>>>> > > Only Type II remailing (Mixmaster / YAMN) is secure!
>>>> > > 
>>>> > 
>>>> > Did you know that YAMN/OmniMix users are the dumbest Usenet users?
>>>> 
>>>>   We just know that you, fascist Claas, and your buddy GabX are the
>>>> stupidest snake oil peddlers over here ignoring even the most basic
>>>> principles of secure anonymous remailing. Good luck to your victims.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Ah, ok. So pseudonymous remailing with Mixmaster and YAMN, in your
>>> eyes, is secure 'anonymous' remailing. Mind you, you must use Tor or
>>> you would shit in your pants without it. So much for TypeII
>>> 'anonymous' remailing. 
>> 
>> It all works with Tor.   No Tor, no work.  
> 
> That's right. +1

wrong it works perfectly fine without tor.