Re: Britain’s Police Are There to Suppress the White Majority

D. Ray wrote:

>July 8, 2026, by Edward Dutton
>
>When a significant portion of society loses trust in the police then that
>society is in serious trouble. In that direction lies the rise of
>protection rackets and the collapse of a unified society. This is
>precisely what has happened in the UK since 1999 and the MacPherson
>Report which accused the police of “institutional racism” based
>mainly on its mishandling of the murder of a Black teenager in London in
>1993. Since 1999, the police have effectively been inculcated with the
>idea that their purpose is to protect ethnic minorities from the native
>population, that nothing is worse than “racism,” that any allegation
>of it must automatically be taken extremely seriously and that, in
>effect, the White man must be assumed to be guilty. It’s gone so far
>that I’ve now had my own run in with the UK police.
>
>Two recent examples serve to illustrate the state of the British
>constabulary. In December 2025 in Southampton, a White student called
>Henry Nowak was stabbed by a Sikh. The Sikh then rang the police and
>dishonestly accused Nowak of having made racist remarks. When the police
>turned up, Nowak was lying on the ground bleeding to death. “I’ve
>been stabbed,” he mumbled. Such was the police’s contempt for him
>that the male officer replied, “I don’t think you have, mate”
>before arresting him and even handcuffing him. The Sikh, who was
>ultimately convicted of murder, was at no point handcuffed, even when he
>was eventually arrested. 
>
>Film has emerged, taken in June in Birmingham, of a young White man being
>beaten up by a group of Blacks. The Blacks are seen dispersing as a
>young, short female police officer rushes in to attack the White man as
>he gets up from the ground. Clearly disorientated and not knowing it’s
>a police officer he strikes back, knocking off her hat. She arrests him,
>adding, “Walk to the fucking car, you dick!” The police initially
>denied that anything was wrong with this incident—before putting out
>another press release claiming that the arrestee had been the victim of
>an assault and they were now looking for the suspects, whom they’d
>permitted to run away. 
>
>If it wasn’t for members of the public filming these things, and
>putting them on Twitter, we would never know about this police corruption
>— this Two-Tier Policing, as it’s commonly termed — so it is no
>wonder that the British government is interested in restricting social
>media access under the pretence of protecting children from “harmful
>content.” Studies on the kinds of people who become police officers
>indicate that they are not very intelligent (their IQ is about average)
>and that they are relatively high in Narcissistic traits (which would
>predict their wanting power and authority over people).
>
>One of the ways in which we can expect them to deal with their
>understandable insecurity about their intelligence and status is to
>proclaim that they are more “moral” than others; to take the current
>morality — Woke — and strongly believe it and signal it in order to
>reassure themselves that they matter. This is precisely what we see with
>the UK police. In the 1990s, they weren’t trusted by the Black minority
>and they were widely regarded as “racist.” This has now been
>completely reversed. They are an arm of the Woke Deep State and are not
>trusted by White people or, at least, not by politically conservative
>White people. 
>
>In March, my crew and I were filming a documentary in Luton, a thoroughly
>Islamised part of the UK that birthed Tommy Robinson’s English Defence
>League. We were at the recently shut down Vauxhall car plant and
>couldn’t get inside due to Nepalese security guides. A camera man I’d
>hired sent up a drone. I thought nothing of this as, in my experience, if
>you’re in a restricted zone for drones — as I once was in Budapest
>— then they simply won’t fly. Before long, a car arrived with three
>police officers, one of the two females being covered in tattoos. They
>arrested the cameraman for flying the drone too close to Luton Airport.
>Worryingly, this means that ex-Communist Hungary has better technology
>than the UK. 
>
>I got chatting to the non-tattooed female officer. She asked what my film
>was about and I innocently said “the decline of Luton.” It was almost
>as if, in that moment, a light bulb went on in her indoctrinated brain:
>decline of Luton = critical of the government = dissident = far right =
>evil. She asked who I was and I refused to tell her. “That’s a bit
>evasive,” she said, reflecting the tendency of the less intelligent to
>misuse high order words. Why wouldn’t I tell her? I responded that, as
>far as I’m concerned, the police can’t be trusted. “We’re not all
>like that,” she responded, seemingly personally offended.
>
>After a while she came over and told me that though I had done nothing
>wrong and I was with someone who’d been arrested and because we were
>near an airport she had the right to my details and could arrest me if I
>refused to provide them. Two barristers later told me that this was
>nonsense and that she was just a corrupt or ignorant police officer. But
>I provided her with an address and number. When we left, she was the only
>one of the three who refused to say goodbye to me. She was very annoyed.
>
>The cameraman was interrogated for three hours and a significant part of
>the interrogation was about me. They wanted my mobile number, which he
>refused to give, so they could “pass it on.” Would the drone be
>filming asylum seekers? It turned out we were close to an asylum seeker
>centre, which explained why there were groups of Black men in track suits
>wandering around. “We’re trying to help you. You could get in trouble
>working with this man. He’s far right.”
>
>Clearly, the British police feel that an aspect of their job is political
>— as with secret police in communist countries. If you are not “on
>board” with Woke — if there’s even the slightest hint that you
>dissent — then you are an “enemy” of the state, you are
>“trouble” and information must be gathered on you. Whites are also
>dangerous and must be heavily policed whereas Blacks are allowed to run
>riot. As this distrust of the police by conservatives grows, we can
>expect to see the growth of parallel societies, of the effective breakup
>of the UK. Certainly, the behavior of the police seems to indicate that
>the British Establishment is deeply concerned that organised dissent —
>or even the mere existence of lone dissenters — among the native
>population might lead to their losing their grip on power. 
>
><https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2026/07/08/britains-police-are-ther
>e-to-suppress-the-white-majority/> 
>
><https://archive.ph/fIJ4K>
>
>

Trannies own Trump