Re: why cant people get to the fucking point!?

At Wed, 5 Aug 2026 19:46:55 +0000, jojo <[email protected]> wrote:

> Lane W wrote:
> > jojo wrote:
> >> Doc Hammerslack wrote:
> >>> At Tue, 4 Aug 2026 11:53:25 -0600, Lane W 
> >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> jojo wrote:
> >>>>> what i hate about many youtube instruction videos is they 
> >>>>> JUST FUCKING
> >>>>> DONT GET TO THE POINT!!!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> i dont want to hear all that other stuff!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> at least with ai if the output is wrong i know i have framed 
> >>>>> the context
> >>>>> and prompt incorrectly, but people who literally put the 
> >>>>> solution in the
> >>>>> title of the video should fucking get to the point!
> >>>>>
> >>>> Yah, I don't watch very many videos although I was thinking 
> >>>> of moving in
> >>>> that direction. When the answer is in text, or slightly less 
> >>>> convenient,
> >>>> slides, I can skim through and get the answer fast. I don't 
> >>>> think you
> >>>> can really do that with video, but maybe it's something you 
> >>>> could make
> >>>> available to the public. Someone would thank you, and % 
> >>>> wouldn't call
> >>>> you a deadbeat anymore. It would be kind of like inventing the
> >>>> telephone, for example. Something for you to do.
> >>>
> >>> A lot of videos have transcripts, thanks to AI.
> >>>
> >>> (It's under "more".)
> >>>
> >>
> >> but that is not the point, if i wanted to read a solution i 
> >> would just ai, there are certain things which require visuals.
> >>
> > But not:
> > 
> > "The 5 books you need to read."
> > 
> > etc.
> 
> i dont like reading books, no patience and very unrewarding.

You're not reading the right books then.

The question is ... what interests you?

-- 
Doc Hammerslack
] The demonic UFO fleet seen once a Millenium cannot possibly ever 
] be recreated purely by 'chance,' thenceforth probably to be 
] eaten by rats in Hell.