Re: ITS A COMPUTER QUESTION
"Doc Hammerslack" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.checkmate |
|---|---|
| Organization | The Unnamed Newswriter |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At Wed, 12 Aug 2026 18:42:28 -0600, Lane W <[email protected]> wrote: > Doc Hammerslack wrote: > > At Wed, 12 Aug 2026 17:57:28 -0600, Lane W <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> Doc Hammerslack wrote: > >>> At Tue, 11 Aug 2026 19:48:38 +0000, Tom Mix <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> In article <[email protected]>, % > >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> . > >>>>> > >>>>> when you want something to stop doing something how do you stop > >>>>> it > >>>> > >>>> ctrl-c, kill -9 pid, pkill > >>> > >>> Those won't just stop the process, but will terminate it. > >>> > >>> To _stop_ a process, you send it SIGSTOP. If it's the > >>> foregrounded process, usually you can hit the stop character, > >>> ctrl-z. > >> > >> If it's a Python process and you want to stop it, then ctrl-D is > >> optimal. This sends the program the right messages and a > >> well-written Python program can handle these cases well. > > > > That's actually yer terminal EOF, Norm. Exits things that look for > > EOF on stdin, like a shell, or a Python r-e-d loop. > > > When did % specify that he wasn't stopping something looking for > stdin? Show your assumptions quite clearly, please. % wasn't very > clear on his set of circumstances, so I don't see why it couldn't > perfectly well be a Python EOF he's looking for. You're obviously not > an engineer. Engineers look for _general_ solutions not specific ones > catered to specious anomalies encountered once a millennium. For > chrissakes, it could have been the chirping microcomputer my mate and > I built in Microcomputing, where the answer is, "Smash it against the > wall." You've got some gumption saying your way is right when there > were zero details given. If only % used a real OS -- he often specifies that he is stuck on MS Windows, Cutler's bastard knock-off of VMS: VMS +111 =WNT Now, Powershell does accept ctrl-d to end the shell, but he said "stop" not "terminate". (Engineering requires precision -- otherwise: the screws rattle.) (On the other hand, he could be using tcsh. His name is a prompt.) -- Doc Hammerslack ] The entity called "Bob" used to control the earth cannot ] possibly ever be examined and exorcised from this so-called ] 'reality.'