Re: "Time to have a chat with the boys."
Tom Mix <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.checkmate,alt.slack |
|---|---|
| Organization | Order of the Eternal Bait |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In article <[email protected]>, "Doc Hammerslack" <[email protected]> wrote: > At Sun, 16 Aug 2026 18:57:01 +0000, Tom Mix <[email protected]> wrote: > >> In article <[email protected]>, Skeeter >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >>> > In article <[email protected]>, >>> [email protected] >>> > says... >>>>> >> > >>>> >> "Time to have a chat with the boys." -"Skeeter" >>>>> >> > >>>> >> So how did that go? >>>>> >> > >>>> >> Assuming "skeeter" was talking to _men_, not "boys", it probably >>>> >> went something like this: >>>>> >> > >>>> >> <"Skeeter"> Someone make a dada file with my sayings in it! Waaa! >>>> >> <"the_boys"> ...R U A troll? "Man up", you miserable wuss. >>>>> >> > >>>> >> Meanwhile, "Sn!pe" is fine with all that -- otherwise, he might >>>> >> not be "one of the boys". Might have to start referring to him >>>> >> as "old Yellowstain"... >>>>> >> > >>>> >> (Do you see? This is all grist for the "bulldada" mill. Keep >>>> >> it comin!) >>> > >>> > WTF are you even yammering on about? >>> > >> > >> He is in a spiral, fatboi took a beating. > > Judging from the "qwality" of your invective, I'd say > you're in middle school. > > Do your mommy and daddy know who you're talking to? > Now we can all witness his catabasis as he desperately reaches for clouds. Even his capacity for invective has declined prodigiously. Poor Crayon. -- Tom Mix