Re: Please do not disturb Sn!pe!!!

At Sun, 16 Aug 2026 20:56:32 +0100, [email protected] (Sn!pe) wrote:

> Doc Hammerslack <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > At Sun, 16 Aug 2026 20:08:08 +0100, [email protected] (Sn!pe) wrote:
> > 
> > > Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > He is very busy trying to have conversations
> > > > > with test posts in e-s.test!
> > > > > 
> > > > > FFS!!!!!1!
> > > > >
> > > > 
> > > > And you're following him around like an obsessed crackhead.
> > > >
> > > 
> > > How snowflakey.  I know he's a champion fanboi but a stalker-dork too?
> > > Oh dear me, it's worse than I thought.
> > >
> >
> > I love that you have a "lits-o-haet" in your headers.  (But _that's_
> > not stalky -- oh no!)
> > 
> > I should come up with more handles to fill your "lits".
> > 
> > What do you think of "Skeeter's" libel?  (I think he does it because
> > he doesn't have anything to lose, and he knows he's outclassed -- it's
> > all he has left.)
> >
> 
> Say what, fanboi?  
> 
> You and Snowflakey dancing the paso doble together is a sight to see.

If you had something clever to say, I'm sure you would have choked
on that as bad as you apparently did here.

Have a dose of the one holding your leash:

$ dada skeeterific.pb
Where? 
you poor thing 
I made you do this again. 

-- 
Doc Hammerslack
] The unspeakable PeE-Gospel wielded by Nhee Ghee must without 
] question be grossly underestimated and over-priced.