Re: !
Skeeter <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.checkmate |
|---|---|
| Organization | UTB |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In article <[email protected]>, pursent100 @gmail.com says... > > Skeeter wrote: > > In article <1s05rp8.n0uhjf1soffu8N%[email protected]>, [email protected] > > says... > >> > >> yoyleguy <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> Sn!pe <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> My generation was taught how to punctuate properly at school! > >>> > >>> Every generation thinks it's the correct one. It's just who actually is > >>> the correct generation that nobody really knows. > >>> > >>>> How do you feel about: semicolons; quotation marks; parentheses; > >>>> and (of course) the star performer, the apostrophe? How about the > >>>> Oxford comma? > >>> > >>> I like- no, LOVE, the semi-colon (I can never actually figure out on > >>> whether it has a hyphen or not...) quite a lot and use it a bit > >>> considering how little it gets used in real life. As for the > >>> parentheses, they are alright though I think they look a bit ugly, but > >>> there are no real alternatives. As for the quotation marks, I use them > >>> when I must. With the apostrophe, I always use it correctly, unlike the > >>> (ahem, excuse me,) *plebs* who fail to use it. It's always really > >>> annoying whenever I see "its" where it should be "it's". > >>> > >> > >> The despised "greengrocers' apostrophe" in plural's is bad but > >> superfluous apostrophes in possessives are the worst. I send it's > >> perpetrators to alt.possesive.its.has.no.apostrophe. > >> > >>> > >>> As for the Oxford comma, I have always loved it and defended it; if you > >>> didn't have the Oxford comma, you'd have the sentence "In the office > >>> were the strippers, Joseph Stalin and JFK." (I know, old example) which > >>> implies Stalin and JFK were the strippers. Let's look at a more original > >>> example: While on their walk in Egypt, the murderers, Michael Jackson > >>> and George Washington all tripped on a rock. Yes, it's incredibly > >>> anachronistic, but whatever. If you had the Oxford comma, there would be > >>> no ambiguity on if Stalin was a stripper or if Michael Jackson killed > >>> someone. > >>> > >> > >> An interesting, albeit unconventional, use of the Oxford comma. > >> I applaud your fearlessly adventuresome approach. > >> > >>> > >>> Thanks for coming to my TED talk. > >>> > >> > >> Who is TED? I once had a bear named Ted, or maybe he had me. > >> The mists of time make such memories unreliable. [sigh] > > > > Hey, If you're interested. I made a group over at that place about discussion > > of physics. It's called rb.sci.easyphysics. I like studying about atoms, the > > universe, you know how things work. > > > yea well too bad you don't work now dummy up before i lift you up bring it you so and so and whatever. -- https://rootbadger.com/invite/i7w9b9K7BUMNXZUDwPUvCxxZYcx4aKXrcoIVKJFt https://ibb.co/q26Rmhn NNTP friendly.