Re: !

% <[email protected]>
Newsgroups alt.checkmate
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Skeeter wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>, pursent100
> @gmail.com says...
>>
>> Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <[email protected]>, pursent100
>>> @gmail.com says...
>>>>
>>>> Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <[email protected]>, pursent100
>>>>> @gmail.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <1s05rp8.n0uhjf1soffu8N%[email protected]>, [email protected]
>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> yoyleguy <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sn!pe <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> My generation was taught how to punctuate properly at school!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Every generation thinks it's the correct one. It's just who actually is
>>>>>>>>> the correct generation that nobody really knows.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> How do you feel about: semicolons; quotation marks; parentheses;
>>>>>>>>>> and (of course) the star performer, the apostrophe?  How about the
>>>>>>>>>> Oxford comma?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I like- no, LOVE, the semi-colon (I can never actually figure out on
>>>>>>>>> whether it has a hyphen or not...) quite a lot and use it a bit
>>>>>>>>> considering how little it gets used in real life. As for the
>>>>>>>>> parentheses, they are alright though I think they look a bit ugly, but
>>>>>>>>> there are no real alternatives. As for the quotation marks, I use them
>>>>>>>>> when I must. With the apostrophe, I always use it correctly, unlike the
>>>>>>>>> (ahem, excuse me,) *plebs* who fail to use it. It's always really
>>>>>>>>> annoying whenever I see "its" where it should be "it's".
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The despised "greengrocers' apostrophe" in plural's is bad but
>>>>>>>> superfluous apostrophes in possessives are the worst. I send it's
>>>>>>>> perpetrators to alt.possesive.its.has.no.apostrophe.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> As for the Oxford comma, I have always loved it and defended it; if you
>>>>>>>>> didn't have the Oxford comma, you'd have the sentence "In the office
>>>>>>>>> were the strippers, Joseph Stalin and JFK." (I know, old example) which
>>>>>>>>> implies Stalin and JFK were the strippers. Let's look at a more original
>>>>>>>>> example: While on their walk in Egypt, the murderers, Michael Jackson
>>>>>>>>> and George Washington all tripped on a rock. Yes, it's incredibly
>>>>>>>>> anachronistic, but whatever. If you had the Oxford comma, there would be
>>>>>>>>> no ambiguity on if Stalin was a stripper or if Michael Jackson killed
>>>>>>>>> someone.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> An interesting, albeit unconventional, use of the Oxford comma.
>>>>>>>> I applaud your fearlessly adventuresome approach.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks for coming to my TED talk.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Who is TED?  I once had a bear named Ted, or maybe he had me.
>>>>>>>> The mists of time make such memories unreliable.  [sigh]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hey, If you're interested. I made a group over at that place about discussion
>>>>>>> of physics. It's called rb.sci.easyphysics.  I like studying about atoms, the
>>>>>>> universe, you know how things work.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> yea well too bad you don't work now dummy up before i lift you up
>>>>>
>>>>> bring it you so and so and whatever.
>>>>>
>>>> i thought i saw tim yesterday
>>>
>>> That guy Alan in the Limbaugh group reminds me of him.
>>>
>> i remember him from years back
> 
> Same as tim, copy cat, tries to twist everything around, he tries to play me
> with games I put in the book hes reading. usenet is getting boring so I snag
> whatever I can. We are having some fun in our own deal. Snipe is in there, Tom,
> a few others. Check it out.
> 
i'm too lazy
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.