Re: ????Re: ????"we" made the Play st ore?????????
Skeeter <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | alt.checkmate,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.transgendered,alt.flame,alt.slack |
|---|---|
| Organization | UTB |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says... > > At Tue, 25 Aug 2026 13:55:21 +0000, ??????????Jen?????????? > Dershmenderdenden...den-den *jazz hands*???????? ?? ?????????? > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 25 Aug 2026 13:14:34 +0000, LO AND BEHOLD; "Doc Hammerslack" > > <[email protected]> determined that the following was of > > great importance to "Doc Hammerslack" <[email protected]> > > and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in > > <[email protected]>: > > > > ???? At Tue, 25 Aug 2026 11:36:45 +0000, ???? ??????????Jen??????? ???? > > ??? Dershmenderdenden...den-den *jazz ???? hands*???????? ?? ???? > > ?????????? <[email protected]> wrote: ???? ???????? On Tue, 25 Aug 2026 > > 02:45:22 +0000, LO AND BEHOLD; YEE-HAAAAAW!!!1!! The ???????? one > > gallon of butthurt tranny-obsessed and ever-morphing conservative > > ???????? scum that posts as "Tom Mix <[email protected]>" sloshing > > around in a ???????? ten gallon hat that's hot-iron branded with a > > non-RFC compliant ???????? "Message-Id" header (see: ???????? > > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5322>) once again feebly > > ???????? whimpered, whined, and determined that the following was of > > great ???????? importance to Tom Mix <[email protected]> and > > subsequently decided to ???????? freely share it with us in > > <[email protected]>: ???????? > > ????Inarticle<[email protected]>,Ken ???????? > > itoBenito ????<[email protected]>wrote: ???? ???????? > > ????????OnSat,22Aug202614:47:36-0600,Skeeter<invali ???????? > > [email protected]>wrote: ???????? ????????????Inarticle<N.KYkZ.uOPGUDs0@69. > > ???????? 103.234.175>,[email protected]... ???????? > > ????????????????Yousureabouttha ???????? t,TonyEaks? ???????? > > ????????????????????? ???????? ?????? ???????? ????????????????herearetheOFFIC > > ???????? IALlinks: ???????? ????????????????????? ???????? ?????? ???????? > > ????????????https://play.google.com/store ???????? > > /apps/details?id=com.rootbadger.app ???????? ???????????????? ???????? > > ????????????Readitandweepfaggot. ???????? > > ????????Ican'trecallanyonebeingasjealousasRobertisp ???????? > > rovinghimselfto ???????? > > ????????be.Iwonderhowhewilltrytodivertfromthetrutho ???????? > > fhisjealousy? ???????? > > ????????IdoubtIwilleverknow.Meh.Arethereanyplansonm ???????? akingit > > ????????availableforiOS? ???? ???????? > > ????Apparently,thecostofanappledevaccountwastoomuchfornow. ???????? ???? > > ????Oh,andaboutJen?https://ibb.co/238r9TB9 ???????? ???? Is that the face > > you make when you and a dozen of your ???????? p3d0 friends can't > > afford an Apple dev account? "Standard Developer ???????? Program: > > Costs $99 per year (renewed annually). This tier lets you ???????? > > publish apps to the public App Store, use TestFlight for beta > > testing, ???????? and access advanced app tools." LOL Maybe Kent can > > sell his guns and ???????? pitch in their 35 dollar value. ???? ???? > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lxAkfmXQw5Y ???? > > > > It was surely embarrassing for him how he had to admit that they > > can't afford a $99 dev license to try and hide the "one trick pony" > > nature of their "development team". > > > > He could have just told Kent that they aren't going to make an Apple > > version because they are targeting people with android phones for > > their trojan horse malware. Apple enforces that stuff very strictly > > and would get the feds involved if they had to, so it's a no-go for > > the badgerBoners. > > > > Make that face again, Tom! LOL > > > > It's unfortunate they didn't just make a newsreader -- Android > could use one. As I've gotten older, I've learned to leverage > time for maximum benefit -- an app tied to a web site is less > useful than an NNTP client that has the site as default. > > Of course, a general NNTP client wouldn't be trustworthy > without the source. Haven't seen a github link yet. > Looks quite hinky/greasy. > > (Not sure why they keep posting about it on the USENET. You'd think > they'd scram already.) LOL. I love watching you and Jenny stomp your feet. You have no idea what is in the mix. -- https://rootbadger.com/invite/i7w9b9K7BUMNXZUDwPUvCxxZYcx4aKXrcoIVKJFt https://ibb.co/q26Rmhn https://play.google.com/store/search?q=rootbadger&c=apps&utm_source=na_Med NNTP friendly.