Re: (Eve1465) satan is **cursed** to not be hungry at all ... but even He never had his MEDICAL LICENSE REVOKED

On Sat, 29 Aug 2026 13:19:07 -0400, Seymour Hare <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
>
>"In summary, the primary reason for Dr. Chung’s license revocation was
>the board’s determination that his diagnosed psychiatric conditions
>made him incapable of practicing medicine with reasonable skill and
>safety, as verified through official evaluations and board
>deliberations"  - co-pilot AI
>
>
>https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/quack
>
>quack - a person who dishonestly pretends to have medical skills or
>knowledge
>
>
>https://www.ajc.com/blog/investigations/wonderfully-hungry-doc-suspended-medical-board/cqUeGUzdksyhvhTfYYQmvI/
>
>By Carrie Teegardin
>Aug 4, 2016
>
>A Georgia physician who asks almost everyone if they are "wonderfully
>hungry" was told by the Georgia Composite Medical Board on Thursday
>that his license will be revoked if he doesn't complete a mental and
>physical evaluation within 30 days.
>
>Dr. Andrew Ben-Hua Chung had his license suspended by the board in
>June after failing to comply with an order to complete a comprehensive
>exam. The board said in its summary suspension order that it had
>concerns about the doctor's ability to practice safely, saying its
>investigation found that Chung refuses to speak to people unless they
>state they are "wonderfully hungry."
>
>https://gcmb.mylicense.com/verification
>
>Name: Andrew Ben-Hua Chung
>Designation: MD
>Lic #: 40347
>Profession: Physician
>Subtype: Full
>Status: Lapsed
>Issued: 8/3/1995
>Expires: 7/31/2017
>Street Address: **********
>MABLETON GA 30126
>County: Cobb
>Country: United States
>Public Document 04-40347
>
>ORDER OF THE BOARD:
>Comes now, the Georgia Composite Medical Board and hereby enters an
>Order after reviewing the Initial Decision in the above styled case.
>After hearing the argument and testimony of the Appellant herein,
>Andrew Ben-Hua Chung, M.D., the Board finds as follows after
>deliberation:
>
>FINDINGS OF FACT: The Board agrees with the initial decision.
>
>CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
>The Board agrees with the initial decision regarding conclusions of
>law.
>
>CONCLUSION
>The Board Orders that the respondent's license is revoked instanter.
>This the 9th day of March 2017.
>



The Georgia Composite Medical Board took action against Dr. Andrew
Ben-Hua Chung's medical license due to long-standing concerns about
his mental fitness and ability to practice safely, which culminated in
his failure to comply with mandatory evaluation orders.The primary
factors leading to his multi-year disciplinary battle and eventual
final board decisions include:

1. Refusal to Comply with Medical Evaluations

Dr. Chung's license was initially suspended after he failed to comply
with a board order requiring him to complete a comprehensive mental
and physical examination. The board explicitly warned that a failure
to submit the psychiatric evaluation results within a set timeframe
would trigger a license revocation.

2. Erratic Behavior and "Wonderfully Hungry" Mandate

The board launched an investigation after receiving complaints from
local attorneys regarding erratic behavior that raised severe patient
care concerns. Investigative findings and public hearing testimonies
revealed that Dr. Chung refused to converse or interact with patients,
board members, or witnesses unless they explicitly stated they were
"wonderfully hungry".

3. Controversial Dietary Teachings

The board's scrutiny was intensified by Dr. Chung's public promotion
of his "Be Hungry" diet book, which instructed individuals to strictly
limit their intake to 32 ounces of food per day. His unorthodox
practices and social media presence further drew negative attention
due to a tenuous connection to a high-profile 2012 starvation case
involving a teenager, though criminal culpability was limited to the
child's mother.

4. Failure to Reverse Board Suspensions

Dr. Chung repeatedly contested the state's actions through
administrative agency reviews and hearings. However, because his
behavior persisted during live hearings and he failed to successfully
fulfill the board's standard medical prerequisites for safe practice,
the state consistently upheld its restrictions—ultimately solidifying
his disciplinary status in the March 2025 Final Decision