Re: Gypsy Taub Interviews Nudists Julie and Rich
"Terry J. Wood" <[email protected]> Mon, 15 Jun 26 06:01:48 UTC
| Newsgroups | rec.nude,alt.christnet.nudism |
|---|---|
| Organization | Usenet.Farm |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"Neosapienis" <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]: > Hello Terry, > There is nowhere in the NT where Jesus takes stances for or against > homosexuality. I once pointed this out in a letter to a campus preacher named Brother Jed. He got so angry he thereafter addressed me as "Queer Terry" rather than "Dear Terry". There's something that upsets some people when they realize they don't have the approval of JESUS for their bigotry. What did Jesus have to say about homosexuality? Absolutely nothing. > Much of the NT was written by Paul who never met Jesus in person and > wrote some disparaging letters about homosexuals in the book of the > Corinthians (see 1 Corinthians 6: 9 - 20 for example) as well as in > Romans where he even condemned lesbians as well. > http://www.libchrist.com/other/homosexual/romans.html A lot of people are shocked to discover that Jesus didn't even KNOW Paul. Jesus never met him, let alone authorized Paul to speak on His behalf. People are dismayed when asked, "Do you follow Jesus or do you follow PAUL?" They are just as dismayed when told "When reading the Bible, listen FOR the word of God." They (like Brother Jed) often quote Leviticus as justification for persecution of homosexuals. But they don't have a problem with wearing clothes made of cotton and polyester (Leviticus 19:19) or cutting their hair or beard (Leviticus 19:27) or even getting a tattoo (Leviticus 19:28). Leviticus 11:12 makes is clear that you can't eat shellfish. If someone is going to follow the teachings of the Old Testament, shouldn't they follow ALL of the teachings? Or if they quote the book of Leviticus as the source of their condemnation, shouldn't they completely follow the book? Fred Phelps' clan, who often quote Leviticus, protested at the funeral of Fred ("Mr. Rogers") Rogers, saying that Mr. Rogers was going to HELL for NOT condemning homosexuals. But I don't see Rev. Fred Phelps with a beard or dreadlocks! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Fred_Phelps_on_his_pulpit.jpg Phelps runs the "GOD HATES" websites and uses Leviticus as his justification. (See http://www.godhatesfags.com and http://www.godhatesamerica.com) Well, I guess I should say he runs MOST of the "GOD HATES" websites. Here's one he doesn't run: http://www.GODHATESSHRIMP.COM The people at GOD HATES SHRIMP dot COM seem to stick it to Phelps at every turn. Check out the photos of them protesting along side of the anti-gay people. They show the absurdity of blindly following one part of the Bible while ignoring the parts we don't like. You can't pick and choose. Check out these photos of their counter protests: http://www.godhatesshrimp.com/photos/IndyPride2007-1.jpg http://tinyurl.com/alckj6 (They need to bring BIGGER signs!) http://www.godhatesshrimp.com/photos/generik.jpg http://www.godhatesshrimp.com/photos/Arrrrkansas.jpg (Read the RED fine print on the BRIGHT GREEN sign) http://www.godhatesshrimp.com/photos/daily_show_11-14-2006.jpg Or visit http://www.godhatesshrimp.com for more. CLEARLY these people live by the code, "Don't get mad, get even!" :-) In any case, I feel Christians should follow the teachings of Christ. If he had something to say on the issue, he would have SAID it!