Re: What are you Afraid of???

On Thu, 28 May 2009 14:00:09 -0700 (PDT), "Naked@Home"
<[email protected]> wrote:

...
>If I took 1,000 pictures of a lot of people of all ages, male and
>female, fat and thin, "Well-endowed" and not-so endowed all of them
>done tastefully and artistically none of them in any way
>"Pornographic" and totally Legal according to all US Laws and sold
>them in appropriate Legal bookstores (Barnes and Noble).

What is your definition of "Pornographic" and totally Legal? Why do
you think their being sold by one or another commercial enterprise has
anything to do with the issue?

...
>Has that child been "Victimized", have I committed a Crime by taking
>those pictures, has the Publisher committed a Crime by printing it,
>the Store by selling it, for that fact did 'JonZee' by buying it and
>'wanking' to the picture???

It shouldn't be, but in many cases the answer is "Yes." Unless you
appreciate why that is so, you are not going to change that answer.


>Now if someone took a naked picture of you (whoever you are) relaxing
>at Blacks Beach and took it home and masturbated to it how are you
>'degraded' or 'defiled' by that??

If it's personally identified or identifiable, then it has a nasty
habit of finding it's way into the hands of people who use it against
that person or their family. Why should anyone accept that.

As more and more laws are passed against this kind of invasion of
privacy, one would hope the situation would ease, but it is just as
likely that such laws trample nudist rights in the process.

AANR and TNS organize volunteers to watch for such laws and make some
effort to deal with them constructively, but all too often
nudists/naturists would rather fight each other than the problem.