Re: For years I have mentioned reaching for the like minded.. not the declared enemies.
Dan MacKay <[email protected]> Thu, 25 Jun 26 10:27:02 UTC
| Newsgroups | rec.nude,alt.cult.nudism,alt.christnet.nudism,aus.culture.naturist |
|---|---|
| Organization | Usenet.Farm |
| Message-ID | <a7348560-f44d-47fa-bd41-fd28e70203c1@s21g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> |
On Jun 5, 1:20=A0am, sexyboy <[email protected]> wrote: > On Jun 3, 5:56=A0pm, Peter Riden <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Tony (Cox) wrote: > > > > The best comment I've seen in this group for a long while, separate= to > > > > my own of course, was this one earlier today: Nudists/Naturists nee= d > > > > to get over our differences as much as possible. There are big > > > > powerful institutions out there looking to crush us in any number o= f > > > > ways. We need all the support and diversity we can manage to put in > > > > our big tent, and when we can't fit someone in our tent, we need to > > > > support them having their own tent, and hope they support us in our= s. > > > This has been said by myself numerous times in different words but I > > believe I live up to it and have been vehemently attacked for doing > > such and included in the few attackers is the very one who posted that > > comment. > > If you say 1 thing and do the exact opposite mostly when it comes to > > repeating my words in a certain way yet attacking me for standing up > > for what I believe in... it's not much going to get results from those > > who still suck up to the most narrow-minded elements of society. So > > Stuffy repeating my words yet going the opposite way doesn't get much > > credibility, here. > > But because I've been telling my few enemies to take a look at whom > > they try to suck up to gain acceptance and stop attacking the more > > liberally minded ones who at no time would attack any alternative > > lifestyle including Nude is a social context or their own lifestyles.. > > yet the few enemies are the ones who ask the ultra uptight narrow > > minded ones to check us out as us being the perverts, the bad ones the > > dangerous ones. > > I'm not talking about diverging ideas or opiniuons. > > Look, Cheri that got a bit of your exasperation directed her way has > > definitely more mild views of Nude Recreation than you and I Tony but > > I never saw hwe attacking wither you, or myself the way I see The > > Little Tribe members doing. > > When I read the likes of Bill Pennington and daring talking about > > disrespected posters and to no surprise "Anna" zooming on you, Tony, > > as being the #1 or "He should be considered as nudism's Osama bin > > Laden. He should be considered nudism's ENEMY NUMBER ONE " it brings > > back the fact that their kind is more in direct line with the > > conservatism and fanatism exhibited by O. B. L. and followers. > > > > > Wake up to yourselves you idiots that continue to, and constantly i= n > > > > some cases, attack any nudist venue that may not be your ideal. > > > > After a while it comes across as either a vendetta or jealousy or a > > > > combination of both! > > > That is exactly what takes place but give credit to Cheri.. she didn't > > go bizzerk the way ON~Anon and any and all few members of The Little > > Tribe went rabid on my venture and myself. > > But what you write sums up what really animates those who go in such a > > frenzy for that long against an opponent they can't defeat. > > > > > Sure - If you have a bad experience somewhere personally then you h= ave > > > > every right to state that, but with facts! > > > > > Stupid innuendo, and irrelevant messages, damages the posters more > > > > than the target, as is proved daily with "annas" posts. > > > Again... reminding the many that you read what each write and take it > > from there rather than being carried by "innuendos". > > > > > Have never understood the concept of making comment about a product > > > > you've never tried yourself. > > > Ask that to The Little Tribe. No one ever came at TGB yet they have > > attacked for quite a while because they feel it represnets something > > other than what they truyly are. > > So if we repesnt inclusivenes and open-mindedness... then you know > > what they are opposed to. > > > > > Not your cup of tea? Cool - then don't try that product! But don't > > > > denigrate those who do - That's basic discrimination as I see it. I= f > > > > it's legal, and you want it gone, then change the fucking law! > > > > > The attempted discrediting of Carolina Foothills in this thread is > > > > another example of such bullshit, and those blindly following the > > > > initial Cheri comment should be ashamed of themselves!- Hide quoted= text - > > > > > - John answered the following > > > Tony....your analysis reeks with bias....certainly a club owner would > > > naturally have this opinion.... > > > I'm sure John that you agree with Tony on this analysis when it comes > > to a club/resort owner who has been under attacks by some who have no > > ideas of what the place or the owners are all about. They obviously > > attack more for what the destination, such as TGB or Tony's > > > but its like we might all like walmart > > but we pay for our goods and have a right to complain if things are > > not satisfactory....same as a place of recreation....if things do not > > suit our expectations we have a right to complain as Anna does... but > > as i have told her ...the complaining tends to increase the amount of > > perverts and lessen the amount of conservative clientele.....may be > > this is the way society works....if hanky panky is rampant then expose > > the facts and let the clientele decide for themselves...but humans are > > like cattle get one to go the direction you want them to go and the > > rest will follow...to be fair to the club ...Cheri should ....tell all > > the facts rather than expect all to follow.....but she understands the > > cattle rule i suppose.....regards...jz > > Never under estimate the power of the dark side, The anti-pleasure > people will stop at nothing to impose their will on all > nonconformists. I think it was H.L.Menkin who described a puritan as > someone who is worried that somewhere someone is enjoying themselves.- Hi= de quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Now, now.... They are not "Anti-Pleasure".... It pleases them no end to be able to control all aspects of how you get your pleasure, and tax it as much as possible.