Re: Public Nudity: Innocent or Sin?
Anna <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | rec.nude,alt.christnet.nudism |
|---|---|
| Organization | Usenet.Farm |
| Message-ID | <497283bc-1de1-44fc-b2b3-8955b77d1147@n33g2000pri.googlegroups.com> |
On Mar 4, 8:58 am, Lane <[email protected]> wrote: > Anna <[email protected]> wrote innews:ebbd2b84-c8d5-48a5-afb1-35f798ffa25e@r15g2000prh.googlegroups.com: > > >> It is the government, such as schools, that is restricted from > >> promoting one set of beliefs over another, a fact nudists need to > >> use. Most citizens in the USA are a member of one religion or > >> another. None is dominate except locally, so these all end up as > >> local battles. > > > Is it really that important, at a High School level at least, to teach > > something that is so controversial? > > That some people might fervently believe that 2+2=5 does not make > arithmetic controversial. Show me these people. > Evolution is science. Creation, and its deriviatives are religion. We > teach science in public schools and not religion. This is not > complicated. Don't teach either. Then no controversy. Let the student decide whether he or she wants to learn about evolution when he or she goes to college. Oh, free choice. Can't have that now.