Re: Public Nudity: Innocent or Sin?
Stuffed Tiger <[email protected]> Sun, 14 Jun 26 12:30:48 UTC
| Newsgroups | rec.nude,alt.christnet.nudism |
|---|---|
| Organization | Usenet.Farm |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, 8 Mar 2009 22:36:42 -0000, "David Looser" <[email protected]> wrote: (regarding Evolution vs. Intelligent Design) >Excellent post Tiger. Thanks, David. (regarding the Bible and Creation) ... >Genesis 2 ... looks as though it is allegorical ... >To want to see it as an accurate >account of actual historical events seems to me to be utterly absurd and, >frankly, more than a little childish. I believe the Bible should be taken literally. Too often people forget that when the Bible says something intended for the tribe of Israel or for people thousands of years ago, that is exactly the literal meaning, not what some TV preacher today might read into it. Your description of Genesis 2 is a literal reading IMHO. Here is an easy reference for people: http://www.suite101.com/lesson.cfm/19167/2757/2 This goes into detail in other sections of the outline on the right.