Re: Public Nudity: Innocent or Sin?

On Mar 4, 12:06 pm, Anna <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mar 4, 8:58 am, Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Anna <[email protected]> wrote innews:ebbd2b84-c8d5-48a5-afb1-35f798ffa25e@r15g2000prh.googlegroups.com:
>
> > >> It is the government, such as schools, that is restricted from
> > >> promoting one set of beliefs over another, a fact nudists need to
> > >> use. Most citizens in the USA are a member of one religion or
> > >> another. None is dominate except locally, so these all end up as
> > >> local battles.
>
> > > Is it really that important, at a High School level at least, to teach
> > > something that is so controversial?
>
> > That some people might fervently believe that 2+2=5 does not make
> > arithmetic controversial.
>
> Show me these people.
>
> > Evolution is science. Creation, and its deriviatives are religion. We
> > teach science in public schools and not religion. This is not
> > complicated.
>
> Don't teach either. Then no controversy. Let the student decide
> whether he or she wants to learn about evolution when he or she goes
> to college.
>
> Oh, free choice.  Can't have that now.

i have also wondered why it is necessary to teach that humans evolve
from primates....the plant life is all that is necessary to the
advancement of technology...and when the students say well do humans
evolve... the instructor can say that is a question left to religion
and culture and humans to debate as nothing is scientificly conclusive
at this point as there is question about the missing link..and of
course explanation of a hymen in human females need to be totally
answered.....it may be that will be offered to you in college...but if
liberal left anarchist and homosexuals and even nudist and
prostitution promoters are to florish then limiting the nay sayers is
at the top of their agenda....as morals ...as we know them could all
be deregulated once the nay sayers are censored....jz