Re: Public Nudity: Innocent or Sin?

In article 
<4e050dbf-5d0a-4c8a-86cf-1d44cb141687@j38g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>,
 Clifford <[email protected]> wrote:

> Ron gets it right when he says:
> I live by the golden rule, an ye harm none, do as ye will. If I want
> to be nude and can do it without being lewd, I
> should be able to.
> 
> BE TRUE TO YOURSELF AND YOU CANNOT BE TRUE TO ANYONE ELSE. That's what
> all normal religions teach; the same - no more, no less.

Sounds like the opposite of the Golden Rule, which is taught extensively 
in traditional (in the US) Christianity.  There are, of course, sunday 
morning Christians, who say all the words on sunday, and then ignore 
them the other six days.  I wouldn't call that so much a failure of the 
religion, as a failure of the people who nominally belong to that 
religion, to actually follow it.
 
> This thread would benefit greatly if people used plainer English to
> express themselves. They might actually get read then! "The exuberance
> of his own verbosity is something up with which I will not put!" (sic)
> - (Winston Churchill)

I agree, although for some posters here, it's not that they are too 
verbose, it's that they don't make any sense, some in sentence 
structure, some in thought and some in both.

-- 
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA
[email protected]