Re: Public Nudity: Innocent or Sin?

In article <[email protected]>,
 Lane <[email protected]> wrote:

> Evolution is science. Creation, and its deriviatives are religion. We
> teach science in public schools and not religion. This is not
> complicated. 

Creation, assuming for sake of argument is true, would also
be science. For a creationist, God's world and everything
He created is science. You get nowhere saying creation is
just religion. 

Saying you teach science and not religion in schools is
also misleading. To teach evolution is to state things evolved
and that then becomes a statement of religion! Simply put,
you are saying a god had little or nothing to do with
how we are here.

> Teaching science means teaching what we have learned from it. Science
> does not claim to offer absolute truth (that's religion's job).
> Information gleaned from science is just that, the information we have
> gleaned to date, subject to refinement as we learn more. 

Actually, you (anyone) hasn't learned a lot. You have gathered
information and interpreted it to fit evolutionary theory. (Note the 
operative word here - theory!) Personally I have found many professors
of science and anthropology who were unwilling to even discuss
their material and simply stated we "know it (evolution) is true"!

Unfortunately, many in evolutionary circles would like you to believe
that no one believes in creationism but ignorant people. Reality is,
many (thousands) of educated scientists believe in creationism.

http://www.creationresearch.org/
http://www.creationism.org/
http://www.biblicalcreation.org.uk/

Someone

-- 
************************
[email protected]