Re: Public Nudity: Innocent or Sin?

On Mar 4, 12:41 pm, Bert Clanton <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mar 4, 10:06 am, Anna <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Mar 4, 8:58 am, Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Evolution is science. Creation, and its deriviatives are religion. We
> > > teach science in public schools and not religion. This is not
> > > complicated.
>
> > Don't teach either. Then no controversy. Let the student decide
> > whether he or she wants to learn about evolution when he or she goes
> > to college.
>
> > Oh, free choice.  Can't have that now.
>
> I wouldn't want my kids to have a choice as to whether they're taught
> in a science class that the universe is 6000-odd years old, or that it
> is 13.7 billion years old. If they're taught the former in a religion
> class in a church, I'm willing to say, "Oh. Ok."; but not if it's in a
> science class in a public school. "Creation science" and "Intelligent
> design science" are not science, and I don't want them taught in
> science classes. So sue me.

and your willing to overlook the unanswered questions about evolution
of man....that figures...jz