Re: Gypsy Taub Interviews Nudists Julie and Rich
Lane <[email protected]> Sun, 14 Jun 26 14:34:25 UTC
| Newsgroups | rec.nude,alt.christnet.nudism |
|---|---|
| Organization | Usenet.Farm |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dan Abel <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]: > In article <[email protected]>, > "Terry J. Wood" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> In short, if Christians have a problem with homosexuals and want to >> use Jesus and Leviticus as justification then they have a lot of >> explaining as to why they follow some parts of Leviticus and other >> parts can be ignored. > > > No. Not at all. You just need to learn how to properly use the > Bible. The first thing to do is to figure out what the truth is. > Everybody knows what that is, it's whatever the truth was before. I > call that the "Anna" technique. That's not too hard, is it? Now that > you know what the truth is, you can use the Bible to prove it. In the > olden days, you either had to know generally what was in there, so you > would know where to look, or you just had to skim through the likely > parts until you found the proof you were looking for. Just skip all > the other irrelevant stuff, like the shrimp and pork. Nobody cares > about that any more. But now, it's all on the computer. Just plug in > what you are looking for, like "homosexual" or "nudity", and then you > just have to look at what's returned, to find the proof for your > Truth. > Too bad Dan is straight. I could see potential. :) Lane