Re: Public Nudity: Innocent or Sin?

Anna <[email protected]> Sun, 14 Jun 26 18:02:08 UTC
Newsgroups rec.nude,alt.christnet.nudism
Organization Usenet.Farm
Message-ID <662b7d4e-1361-43f0-8c0b-037ece9966e3@k29g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
On Mar 4, 10:53 am, Bert Clanton <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mar 4, 10:23 am, Anna <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Mar 4, 10:12 am, Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Anna <[email protected]> wrote in news:b92429e4-83c1-4ae0-87b4-
> > > [email protected]:
>
> > > > On Mar 4, 8:58 am, Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > >> Nobody is forcing anything. Science is being taught. That's it.
>
> > > > You are forcing down your beliefs regarding the origin of our species
> > > > down people's throats.
>
> > > I have no such beliefs. There is physical evidence and a very good
> > > theory that interprest that evidence. I don't believe anything beyond
> > > that.
>
> > Well many people don't believe that. So you are forcing that belief
> > down people's throats instead of allowing people the choice of
> > learning about it.
>
> > > > Since it is so controversial let it be taught elsewhere as opposed to
> > > > public government schools.
>
> > > It is not controversial. That a minority of people deny reality does not
> > > make reality controversial.
>
> > It is far from a small minority.  Look if there is no one in the
> > school district with a problem with it then yeah go ahead teach it.
> > Otherwise they can wait until they get to college if they want to
> > learn about it.
>
> I have just as much right to try to control what is taught in public
> schools as Anna does.

See, that's the difference. I don't want control.  Just want balance.