Re: Is Being a Nude Art Model Dirty?
Zee <[email protected]> Sun, 14 Jun 26 18:12:27 UTC
| Newsgroups | rec.nude,alt.christnet.nudism |
|---|---|
| Organization | Usenet.Farm |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Feb 23, 11:29 pm, "Neosapienis" <[email protected]> wrote: > Maybe she should take a trip with her mum to the Vatican where there are > heaps of examples of artistic nudity in the Sistine Chapel which Pope John > Paul II allowed the public to see. > > Sad that so many Catholics are still hung up about the nude body. :-( > > -- > > Best wishes, > > Dario Western > > Home: (07) 3267-0099 > Mobile: (0437) 428-859 > > Web Page:http://www.myspace.com/fatpizzaman > -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------"Anna" <[email protected]> wrote in message > > news:948d1962-62f7-4dab-838a-a0516f431b9d@v39g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... > > > > >I have always thought of nude art modeling as being one of the > > examples of "innocent" public nudity. > > > Not so according to this Nude Art model who wrote a book about her > > experiences. > > >http://www.latimes.com/features/books/la-et-book20-2009feb20,0,614080... > > >http://tinyurl.com/dzfmm2 > > > She argues for modeling's legitimacy over lunch with her Catholic > > mother, trying to explain "that, despite the popular past association > > of art models with depravity, in the twentieth century, it actually > > became kind of glamorous." (Her mother's response? "It doesn't sound > > glamorous, Kathy, it sounds dirty.") > > > Her mother is right. Despite its pretensions, it is kind of dirty, and > > Rooney is frank about the psychosexual kicks. "There is," she notes, > > "a subtle perversion at work -- this combination of my naked > > vulnerability with the impossibility of my actually being touched -- > > that makes me love modeling so much."- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Dario...i think the point of her thesis is to show the depravity side of the naked side of art...she is probably aware that all of europe has many works of art in the public places and of course the vatican is no exception and would not be of any value to her.....even india is one of the places that censors nudity...yet has graphic displays of pornography.....in public....jz