Re: Why I Went Cold Turkey on Political Theology

Steve Hayes <[email protected]> Fri, 26 Apr 2024 04:46:02 +0200
Newsgroups alt.christnet.rightwing.loonies,alt.politics.religion,alt.religion.christianity,alt.religion.christian,alt.christnet.ethics,alt.christnet.theology
Organization Khanya Publications
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 15:57:09 -0500, "Richard Carl Silk"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>Hey Steve:  If theology has left you feeling cold, here's a *short* something 
>that *may* warm you back up again:

I never said theology had left me cold. 

It was Alastair Roberts who said that he went cold turkey on
*political* theology - to "go cold turkey" doesn't mean that it leaves
you cold, it means that you suddenly abandon something to which you
were addicted. 

And in this case what he suddenly abandoned was a certain kind of
right-wing political theology.

>https://tinyurl.com/itta-TCoU  (If you're fearful of links, let me know, and 
>I'll copy / paste the short story into a post here for you, but it may be awhile 
>before I circle back around to this group.)

I'm not fearful of links, but I don't normally follow links that give
no indication of their subject. So does your link lead to anything
that has to do with theonomic reconstructionism or a critique of the
same?

Or is Usenet now so dead that an ontopic response is the last thing
one would expect?

All the response this post has got has been random and irrelevant
quotes (apparently from a bot) and an unsupported link. 


-- 
Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
Web:  http://www.khanya.org.za/stevesig.htm
Blog: http://khanya.wordpress.com

For information about why crossposting is (usually) good, and multiposting (nearly always) bad, see:
http://oakroadsystems.com/genl/unice.htm#xpost