Re: DISTURBING! Antifa Terrorists Prepared To Release FAKE Naked Pictures of Trump and Some Anonymous Children/Because ANTIFA are PEDOPHILES and have NAKED children pictures
BeamMeUpScotty <[email protected]> Sat, 21 Nov 2020 08:06:21 -0500
| Newsgroups | alt.atheism.satire,alt.christnet.second-coming.real-soon-now,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.trump,soc.culture.usa,misc.survivalism,talk.politics.guns,alt.atheism,alt.law-enforcement,alt.conspiracy,alt.politics.economics,alt.philosophy,alt.politics.usa.constitution,alt.politics.homosexuality,alt.psychology, alt.beam-me-up.scotty.there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here |
|---|---|
| Organization | TAKE THE RED PILL |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 11/20/20 7:15 PM, #BeamMeUpScotty wrote: > Hackers Claim Trump Dirty Laundry Data Has Been Sold To ‘Interested Party’ > > > The REvil crime group, branded as terrorists after threatening to disclose > Trump's 'dirty laundry' if a $42 million (£34.6 million) ransom, the > biggest ever, wasn’t paid, have issued another statement via the dark web > today. > > A ransomware attack against a New York law firm with celebrity clients > apparently morphed from cybercrime to terrorism in just a few days. The > REvil group behind the attack stole data as well as encrypting systems. > The threat of publishing, or selling, that data is then used as leverage > in the ransom negotiations. Comments from the Grubman, Shire, Meiselas and > Sacks law firm published on May 15 changed the whole dynamic of what was > already a serious cybercrime incident. The New York law firm stated that > "we have been informed by the experts and the FBI that negotiating with or > paying ransom to terrorists is a violation of federal criminal law." The > FBI has since stated that ransomware is treated as a criminal > investigation unless deployed by a terrorist organization or nation state. > > However, the use of the ‘terrorist’ word triggered an angry, and quick, > response from the REvil ransomware operators on May 17. In a long and > ranting posting on the dark web, the threat actors said that "Mr. Lawyer > says that Donald has never been their client. And he says that we are > bluffing. Oh well. The first part, with the most harmless information, we > will post here." That posting concluded with links to a collection of 169 > emails purporting to be a small part of the 'dirty laundry' data the group > had on President Trump. > Most Popular In: Cybersecurity > > Forget Google—Huawei Has A Radical New Update To Make Millions Switch > Phones > Second Stimulus Payment Fraud: Why 35 Matters More Than $1,200 > Trump’s Dirty Laundry: Anonymous Hackers Threaten To Reveal All > > MORE FROM FORBESHackers Publish First 169 Trump 'Dirty Laundry' Emails > After Being Branded Cyber-Terrorists > By Davey Winder > > Today, the REvil group has posted yet another update. Here's what it had > to say as far the data about President Trump was concerned: "Interested > people contacted us and agreed to buy all the data about the U.S. > President, which we have accumulated over the entire time of our > activity." The cybercriminals said that they were "very pleased with the > deal," but did not disclose any further information regarding either the > buyer or the amount paid. If, that is, anything was actually sold at all. > > The "most harmless" emails released on the dark web, all 169 of them, > contained absolutely nothing that could be considered as dirt on Trump. > For all intents and purposes, that data dump looked like someone had just > searched an archive for "trump" and put everything returned into a file. > Including trump being used as a verb and messages referring to Trump in > the third-person. The considered opinion of most all the security > intelligence experts I have spoken to is that REvil had nothing of any > consequence on Trump and was, in fact, bluffing as leverage to get a > ransom paid. > MORE FROM FORBESHackers Claim To Have Trump's Dirty Laundry And Demand $42 > Million To Keep Quiet > By Davey Winder > > The statement today would seem to validate that argument. If they had > anything of any real interest about the President then, common sense > suggests, they would have included at least something in that first leak > of data. Something to whet the appetite and hopefully increase the odds of > getting paid out. They didn't. Instead, what we have is a statement that > "solves the problem of them having to produce data they have not actually > got," Brett Callow, a threat analyst at Emsisoft with a particular > interest in dark web intelligence, told me. > > What they probably do have, Callow says, is information related to Madonna > from the celebrity law firm data theft. "Auctioning it is the only way for > them to monetize their attack," Callow says, "as Grubman, Shire, Meiselas > and Sacks has stated it cannot and will not pay the ransom demand." > > That auction of all the data pertaining to Madonna, REvil said, will be on > May 25, and the starting price is a million dollars. > Antifa keeps all the NAKED CHILDREN pictures they can get, so they can photo shop them later or just look at them to get sexually aroused because terrorists are like that, they have multiple mental illnesses. -- TAKE THE RED PILL https://www.oann.com/ https://www.newsmaxtv.com/ https://americasvoice.news/ https://www.infowars.com/ https://www.tatumreport.com/ https://www.parler.com/