NRA America Hater "Gay Wayne" Lapierre Wants The Violently Mentally Ill To Carry Guns

Ubiquitous <[email protected]> Mon, 31 May 2021 15:25:32 -0000 (UTC)
Newsgroups alt.global-warming,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.culture.usa,alt.fan.jai-maharaj,soc.culture.indian,talk.politics.guns,alt.philosophy,alt.politics.trump,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics,alt.politics.conservative,alt.politics.republican,talk.politics.misc,soc.culture.india,alt.christnet.second-coming.real-soon-now
Organization Brain Dead Trumpites mark weber
Message-ID <[email protected]>
(Wayne no longer stands for background checks and psych exams
to get a gun permit, probably because of what they would find
in his closet.   He's batshit crazy.) 


Based on the hysterical hyperbole spilling out the mouth of
National Rifle Association honcho Wayne LaPierre like too much
verbal diarrhea, one would assume the average American and
potential gun owner is a gutless coward who needs a firearm to
shoot anything in sight. 

LaPierre, long an embarrassment to anyone with an IQ over that
of an average vegetable, is edging more and more into the realm
of uncontrollable madman, a raving lunatic who seems to want
everyone in schools armed, even elementary school kids, and who
describes a frightened America filled with citizens cowering in
fear in their homes waiting to shoot anyone who walks in the
door. 

OK, LaPierre hasn’t advocated arming elementary kids.  Not yet,
but based on some of his senseless ramblings, such an idea may
be in the back of his head. 

At the annual gathering of gun fanciers who genuflect to the
NRA’s propaganda, LaPierre claimed an armed America could have
prevented the bombings at the Boston marathon and talked about
the need to arm even granny to keep her safe in her home. 

Which raises an interesting — and disturbing — question.  Is
the target audience of LaPierre and his inate ramblings a
citizen who really needs self protection or is it a collection
of paranoid cowards who need guns to establish some vague
concept of manhood (and womanhood since NRA these days is
targeting women)? 

I’ve known LaPierre for more than 30 years and he has always
been a hysterical, paranoid egomaniac who plays well to the
insane fears of the average gun nut. In his view, America is
best served by a population of gun toting masses walking down
the street with firearms strapped to their sides as a deterrent
to what he sees as a teeming sea of robbers, looters and street
thugs. 

Arming the masses, the told the NRA convention in Houston,
could have prevented the bombings in Boston.  How?  He doesn’t
say, but knowing Wayne, he probably sees deterrence as allowing
anyone to shoot randomly at anyone toting a backpack on a
public street. 

While this kind of hysteria ignores common sense and the
dangers of too many guns in the hands of too many nut cases, it
plays well with the hysterical average member of the National
Rifle Association. 

He suggested most Bostonians withed they had carried a gun at
the Boston Marathon last month. 

And done what?  Fired at anything that moved?  Most Bostonians
want nothing to do with guns. 

He talked about “frightened” people living in fear in their
homes.  Really?  Where? Who? 

Such inanity does nothing to bring reason to the needed debate
over the proliferation of guns in our society and the increase
of violence that leaves too many people dead or wounded. 

After watching LaPierre’s latest tirade at this past weekend’s
NRA gathering, I now understand why the association is fighting
so hard to prevent expansion of background checks and increased
looks at the mental history of those who purchase guns. 

Such a law would prevent crazy loons like Wayne LaPierre or a
lot of the other lunatics who run the NRA from ever legally
obtaining or owning firearms. 

And that alone is the best argument for expanding background
checks.